Cited by 44Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Differential therapeutic effects of 12-week treatment of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on drug-naïve children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A counting Stroop functional MRI study

Chou, Tai-Li, Chia, Seng, Shang, Chi-Yung, Gau, Susan Shur-Fen·2015·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Methylphenidate and atomoxetine are effective in treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with underlying distinct pharmacological mechanisms. To relate neural mechanisms to clinical response, we conducted a comparative trial to differentiate the changes in brain activation of drug-naïve children with ADHD when performing neuropsychological tasks after 12 weeks of pharmacotherapy. We randomized 50 drug-naïve children with ADHD, aged 7-17, to treatment with methylphenidate (n=25) or atomoxetine (n=25). These children were scanned twice with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during the counting Stroop task before and after treatment. Focused attention and impulsivity were assessed twice by using the Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CCPT). The final sample for fMRI analysis comprised 20 in the methylphenidate group and 22 in the atomoxetine group. Atomoxetine decreased activations in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which correlated with improvement in focused attention assessed by the CCPT. In contrast, methylphenidate increased activations in the inferior frontal gyrus, which correlated with the decreasing severity of impulsivity assessed by the CCPT. The current findings suggest that differential therapeutic effects on neuronal changes induced by 12-week treatment atomoxetine and methylphenidate may contribute to behavioral improvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.08.024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 53 · Cited by 44

Authors
Chou, T.-L., Chia, S., Shang, C.-Y., & Gau, S. S.-F.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Gau, Susan Shur-Fen
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
2300-2310
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1449657760
Cited by
44
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health Research Institute (NHRI-EX98-9407PC)
  • National Science Council Taiwan (NSC98-2314-B-002-051-MY3, NSC99-2627-B-002-015, NSC100-2627-B-002-014, NSC101-2627-B-002-002, NSC-101-2627-B-002-001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, atomoxetine, methylphenidate, pharmacotherapy, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, focused attention, impulsivity
MeSH terms
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Child, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Methylphenidate, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Taiwan, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review