Group cognitive-behavioural therapy for hoarding disorder: an interim analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to controlled clinical trials, rules tend to be more flexible and lenient in effectiveness studies.
“Compared to controlled clinical trials (e.g., Tolin et al., 2019), rules tend to be more flexible and lenient in effectiveness studies (Chandler and Fogg, 2018;Moulding et al., 2017).”
From A naturalistic study of emotion regulation-enhanced cognitive-behavioral group therapy for hoarding disorder in a community setting (2022) · cites this paper as Chandler and Fogg, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grisham, J. R., Yap, K., Isemann, S., Svehla, J., Briggs, N., & Norberg, M. M. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100450 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Compared to controlled clinical trials (e.g., Tolin et al., 2019), rules tend to be more flexible and lenient in effectiveness studies (Chandler and Fogg, 2018; Moulding et al., 2017).”
- Authors
- Chandler, A., & Fogg, R.
- Affiliations
- South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust (GB)
- ORCID
- Chandler, Augusta
- Venue
- European Neuropsychopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 772
- ISSN
- 0924-977X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807869717
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- hoarding disorder, group cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, functional disability, treatment outcomes, attrition, peer support, shame, social isolation, home-based therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
