The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What about psychiatrists' attitude to mentally ill people?
Abstract
Objective: Firstly, to assess and, secondly, to compare experts' and lay attitudes towards community psychiatry and the respective social distance towards mentally ill people. Method: Comparison of two representative Swiss samples, one comprising of 90 psychiatrists, the other including 786 individuals of the general population. Results: The psychiatrists' attitude was significantly more positive than that of the general population although both samples have a positive attitude to community psychiatry. The statement that mental health facilities devalue a residential area has revealed most agreement. Psychiatrists and the public do not differ in their social distance to mentally ill people. Among both samples, the level of social distance increases the more the situation described implies ‘social closeness’. Conclusion: The strategy to use psychiatrists as role models or opinion leaders in anti-stigma campaigns cannot be realised without accompanying actions. Psychiatrists must be aware that their attitudes do not differ from the general public and, thus, they should improve their knowledge about stigma and discrimination towards people with mental illnesses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determinants of burden in caregivers of patients with exacerbating schizophrenia
Lauber, C., Eichenberger, A., Luginbühl, P., Keller, C., & Rössler, W. (2003) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2003.06.004 · Cited by 154
Self-citationJorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Medway, J., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. (2000) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s001270050230 · Cited by 110 · cited 1×
“about attitudes towards mentally ill people [4].”
Cited by
The Impact of Mental Illness Stigma on Seeking and Participating in Mental Health Care
Corrigan, P. W., Druss, B. G., & Perlick, D. A. (2014) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100614531398 · Cited by 1,642
Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma
Rüsch, N., Angermeyer, M. C., & Corrigan, P. W. (2005) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.04.004 · Cited by 1,621
Mental health-related stigma in health care and mental health-care settings
Henderson, C., Noblett, J., Parke, H., Clement, S., Caffrey, A., Gale-Grant, O., Schulze, B., Druss, B., & Thornicroft, G. (2014) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(14)00023-6 · Cited by 761
Stigma and mental health professionals: A review of the evidence on an intricate relationship
Schulze, B. (2007) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540260701278929 · Cited by 591
Prejudice and schizophrenia: a review of the ‘mental illness is an illness like any other’ approach
Read, J., Haslam, N., Sayce, L., & Davies, E. (2006) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00824.x · Cited by 548
Metadata
- Authors
- Lauber, C., Anthony, M., Ajdacic-Gross, V., & Rössler, W.
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 423-427
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- OpenAlex
- W2070718066
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What about psychiatrists' attitude to mentally ill people? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.06.019
- The paper
- Lauber, C., Anthony, M., Ajdacic-Gross, V., & Rössler, W. (2004). What about psychiatrists' attitude to mentally ill people? European Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.06.019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
