Cited by 64Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Psychiatry

Psychiatrists’ attitude to antipsychotic depot treatment in patients with first-episode schizophrenia

Heres, S., Reichhart, T., Hamann, J., Mendel, R., Leucht, S., Kissling, W.·2011·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Despite good clinical evidence, depot antipsychotics are only seldom prescribed to patients with first episode schizophrenia. The present study aims at investigating psychiatrists’ reasons for this reservation. Method: We surveyed 198 psychiatrists on their attitude toward offering depot treatment to first episode patients (FEP). Participants scored the extent of influence of individual factors on their decision on a seven-point-scale, additional data on their prescription practice and estimation of the relapse risk of FEP were collected. Results: Psychiatrists reported that only three out of 12 factors were of influence. These were the limited availability of different second generation antipsychotic depot drugs, the frequent rejection of the depot offer by the patients and the patients’ skepticism based on the lack in experience of a relapse. Conclusions: There is actually little specific reason for not prescribing depot to FEP according to the current survey. For those factors being reported to be of influence, psychoeducation, including profound information on depot treatment, the development of additional SGA depot drugs and the standard offer of depot treatment to all FEP in a shared-decision-making may be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.12.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 64

Authors
Heres, S., Reichhart, T., Hamann, J., Mendel, R., Leucht, S., & Kissling, W.
Affiliations
TUM Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Heres, S.
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2011-08
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
297-301
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2032889433
Cited by
64
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
long-acting injectable antipsychotics, first-episode schizophrenia, psychiatrists' attitudes, prescribing patterns, relapse risk, atypical antipsychotics, psychoeducation, shared decision-making, treatment decision factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatry, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review