Psychiatrists’ attitude to antipsychotic depot treatment in patients with first-episode schizophrenia
Abstract
Objective: Despite good clinical evidence, depot antipsychotics are only seldom prescribed to patients with first episode schizophrenia. The present study aims at investigating psychiatrists’ reasons for this reservation. Method: We surveyed 198 psychiatrists on their attitude toward offering depot treatment to first episode patients (FEP). Participants scored the extent of influence of individual factors on their decision on a seven-point-scale, additional data on their prescription practice and estimation of the relapse risk of FEP were collected. Results: Psychiatrists reported that only three out of 12 factors were of influence. These were the limited availability of different second generation antipsychotic depot drugs, the frequent rejection of the depot offer by the patients and the patients’ skepticism based on the lack in experience of a relapse. Conclusions: There is actually little specific reason for not prescribing depot to FEP according to the current survey. For those factors being reported to be of influence, psychoeducation, including profound information on depot treatment, the development of additional SGA depot drugs and the standard offer of depot treatment to all FEP in a shared-decision-making may be considered.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychiatrists generally believe that patients are less willing to accept LAIs than oral treatments and they avoid proposing it.
“Psychiatrists generally believe that patients are less willing to accept LAIs, than oral treatments and they avoid proposing it [64]”
From The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: A clinical review (2020) · cites this paper as [64]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Heres, S., Reichhart, T., Hamann, J., Mendel, R., Leucht, S., & Kissling, W.
- Affiliations
- TUM Klinikum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Heres, S.
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 297-301
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- OpenAlex
- W2032889433
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- long-acting injectable antipsychotics, first-episode schizophrenia, psychiatrists' attitudes, prescribing patterns, relapse risk, atypical antipsychotics, psychoeducation, shared decision-making, treatment decision factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatry, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Health Care Surveys
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review