Insight in schizophrenia–course and predictors during the acute treatment phase of patients suffering from a schizophrenia spectrum disorder
Open accessAbstract
Background: To analyse insight of illness during the course of inpatient treatment, and to identify influencing factors and predictors of insight. Methods: Insight into illness was examined in 399 patients using the item G12 of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (“lack of insight and judgement”). Ratings of the PANSS, HAMD, UKU, GAF, SOFAS, SWN-K and Kemp's compliance scale were performed and examined regarding their potential association with insight. The item G12 was kept as an ordinal variable to compare insight between subgroups of patients. Results: Almost 70% of patients had deficits in their insight into illness at admission. A significant improvement of impairments of insight during the treatment (p<0.0001) was observed. At admission more severe positive and negative symptoms, worse functioning and worse adherence were significantly associated with poorer insight. Less depressive symptoms (p= 0.0004), less suicidality (p= 0.0218), suffering from multiple illness-episodes (p<0.0001) and worse adherence (p= 0.0012) at admission were identified to be significant predictors of poor insight at discharge. Conclusion: The revealed predictors might function as treatment targets in order to improve insight and with it outcome of schizophrenia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Poor insight in schizophrenia occurs across different cultures and at different phases of the illness.
“Poor insight in schizophrenia is prevalent across cultures and phases of illness.”
From Insight in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: relationship with behavior, mood and perceived quality of life, underlying causes and emerging treatments (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Schennach, R., Meyer, S., Seemüller, F., Jäger, M., Schmauss, M., Laux, G., Pfeiffer, H., Naber, D., Schmidt, L. G., Gaebel, W., Klosterkötter, J., Heuser, I., Maier, W., Lemke, M. R., Rüther, E., Klingberg, S., Gastpar, M., Möller, H.-J., & Riedel, M.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- University of Cologne (DE)
- Stiftung Charité (DE)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Alsterdorf (DE)
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schennach, R.
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-04-28
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 625-633
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- OpenAlex
- W1998986694
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- insight into illness, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, medication adherence, positive and negative symptoms, depressive symptoms, suicidality, functional disability
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Adult, Awareness, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review