Cited by 32Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychiatric care and mental health services

Insight in schizophrenia–course and predictors during the acute treatment phase of patients suffering from a schizophrenia spectrum disorder

Open access
Schennach, R., Meyer, S., Seemüller, F., Jäger, M., Schmauss, M., Laux, G., Pfeiffer, H., Naber, D. +11 more·2012·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: To analyse insight of illness during the course of inpatient treatment, and to identify influencing factors and predictors of insight. Methods: Insight into illness was examined in 399 patients using the item G12 of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (“lack of insight and judgement”). Ratings of the PANSS, HAMD, UKU, GAF, SOFAS, SWN-K and Kemp's compliance scale were performed and examined regarding their potential association with insight. The item G12 was kept as an ordinal variable to compare insight between subgroups of patients. Results: Almost 70% of patients had deficits in their insight into illness at admission. A significant improvement of impairments of insight during the treatment (p<0.0001) was observed. At admission more severe positive and negative symptoms, worse functioning and worse adherence were significantly associated with poorer insight. Less depressive symptoms (p= 0.0004), less suicidality (p= 0.0218), suffering from multiple illness-episodes (p<0.0001) and worse adherence (p= 0.0012) at admission were identified to be significant predictors of poor insight at discharge. Conclusion: The revealed predictors might function as treatment targets in order to improve insight and with it outcome of schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2012.01.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 32

Authors
Schennach, R., Meyer, S., Seemüller, F., Jäger, M., Schmauss, M., Laux, G., Pfeiffer, H., Naber, D., Schmidt, L. G., Gaebel, W., Klosterkötter, J., Heuser, I., Maier, W., Lemke, M. R., Rüther, E., Klingberg, S., Gastpar, M., Möller, H.-J., & Riedel, M.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Alsterdorf (DE)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Corresponding author
Schennach, R.
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2012-04-28
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
625-633
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W1998986694
Cited by
32
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
insight into illness, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, medication adherence, positive and negative symptoms, depressive symptoms, suicidality, functional disability
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Awareness, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review