Cited by 31Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Utilization patterns of antidepressants between 1991 and 2011 in a population-based cohort of middle-aged and elderly

Open access
Aarts, N., Noordam, R., Hofman, A., Tiemeier, H., Stricker, B.H., Visser, L.E.·2014·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: In middle-aged and older patients in whom antidepressant use increased in last decades, patterns of use might be of concern The objective of this study was to investigate the patterns of prevalence, incidence and duration of antidepressant use in an ageing population. Methods: All participants (aged > 45 years) from the population-based Rotterdam Study were followed from January 1st 1991 until death, loss to follow-up, or end of the study period (December 31st 2011). Antidepressant drug dispensing, based on pharmacy records, were subdivided into Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCAs), Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and other antidepressants. One-year prevalence, 5-year incidence and duration of antidepressant use were calculated. Results: Yearly prevalence of antidepressant use increased from 3.9% in 1991 to 8.3% of the population in 2011. The increase in SSRI use was 5.8-fold, whereas use of other antidepressants doubled and TCA use remained stable over time. Incidence of all antidepressants decreased from 23.9 to 14.2 per 1000 person-years between 1992 and 2011. The duration of a first treatment episode increased over time. Conclusion: Despite the prevalence of antidepressant use increased over time, incidence did not, which is most likely explained by a longer treatment duration and recurrent episodes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2014.02.001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Growing long-term use, often over several years, is a significant reason for the world-wide increase in the consumption of antidepressant medications over the last 2-3 decades.

    “Growing long-term use, often over several years, is a significant reason for the world-wide increase in the consumption of antidepressant medications over the last 2–3 decades (Aarts et al., 2014; Amrein et al., 2023; Mars et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aarts, N., Noordam, R., Hofman, A., Tiemeier, H., Stricker, B. H., & Visser, L. E.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Stricker, B.H.
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2014-08
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
365-370
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W1963489474
Cited by
31
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
antidepressant use, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, middle-aged and older adults, older adults, Rotterdam Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Drug Utilization, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review