Social networking sites and mental health problems in adolescents: The mediating role of cyberbullying victimization
Abstract
Background: Previous research has suggested an association between the use of social networking sites (SNSs) and mental health problems such as psychological distress, suicidal ideation and attempts in adolescents. However, little is known about the factors that might mediate these relationships. The present study examined the link between the use of social networking sites and psychological distress, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, and tested the mediating role of cyberbullying victimization on these associations in adolescents. Methods: The sample consisted of a group of 11-to-20-year-old individuals (n = 5126, 48% females; mean ± SD age: 15.2 ± 1.9 years) who completed the mental health portion of the Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey (OSDUHS) in 2013. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to test the mediation models. Results: After adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, subjective socioeconomic status (SES), and parental education, use of SNSs was associated with psychological distress (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval = 2.03, 1.22–3.37), suicidal ideation (3.44, 1.54–7.66) and attempts (5.10, 1.45–17.88). Cyberbullying victimization was found to fully mediate the relationships between the use of SNSs with psychological distress and attempts; whereas, it partially mediated the link between the use of SNSs and suicidal ideation. Conclusion: Findings provide supporting evidence that addressing cyberbullying victimization and the use of SNSs among adolescents may help reduce the risk of mental health problems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increased cyberbullying leads to more psychological distress, reduced life satisfaction, increased depressive symptoms and anxiety, or even suicidal thoughts and attempts.
“Increased cyberbullying, however, leads to more psychological distress, reduced life satisfaction, increased depressive symptoms and anxiety [131], or even suicidal thoughts and attempts [132].”
From How social media usage affects psychological and subjective well-being: testing a moderated mediation model (2023) · cites this paper as [132]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 131
- Authors
- Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., & Hamilton, H. A.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- ORCID
- Hamilton, H.A.
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2015-10-26
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1021-1027
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- OpenAlex
- W1875997827
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 22.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Keywords
- social networking sites, adolescents, cyber victimization, psychological distress, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, mediation, adolescent mental health
- MeSH terms
- Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Ontario, Stress, Psychological, Students, Suicide, Odds Ratio, Crime Victims, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Bullying, Suicidal Ideation, Social Networking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review