Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The effects of support interventions on anxiety and depression in women with preterm labor during hospitalization

Open access
Kao, M.H., Chie-Pein Chen, C.P.·2017·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Aim: To examine the effects of support interventions on anxiety, depression in women hospitalized with preterm labour at admission and 2 weeks. Background: Hospitalized pregnant women with preterm labour have significantly higher anxiety and depression levels. Few studies have explored the effects of support interventions on anxiety, depression in such women. Methods: A randomized, single-blind experimental design was used. The control group (n = 103) and intervention group (n = 140) were recruited from the maternity wards of one medical centre in northern Taiwan between January 2013 and April 2015. The control group received routine nursing care. The experimental group received support interventions, which included an interview, distraction methods and assistance with daily living needs. Groups were evaluated with the Beck anxiety inventory, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and at admission and 2 weeks of hospitalization. Results: There were no significant differences between groups for demographics, obstetric characteristics, or birth outcomes. For the control group, anxiety and depression scores increased significantly decreased 2 weeks after hospitalization. The intervention group had a small, but significant, increase in anxiety and no significant change in depression at 2 weeks. Participants who received 2 weeks of support intervention had significantly lower anxiety and depression scores than the control group. Conclusions: Providing interventional support could reduce anxiety and depression for women with preterm labour during hospitalization. Disclosure of interest: The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1352

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Kao, M. H., & Chie-Pein Chen, C. P.
Affiliations
Mackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management (TW)
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2017-04
Volume
41
Issue
S1
Pages
S736-S737
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2730147234
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
preterm labor, anxiety, depression, support interventions, hospitalized pregnant women, maternity ward, daily living support, maternal mental health, nursing care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of support interventions on anxiety and depression in women with preterm labor during hospitalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1352
The paper
Kao, M. H., & Chie-Pein Chen, C. P. (2017). The effects of support interventions on anxiety and depression in women with preterm labor during hospitalization. European Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.1352

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.