Burnout in Medical Residents: Prevalence and Risk Factors
Open accessAbstract
Background: Burnout is a state of mental and physical exhaustion related to work. It is manifested in a variety of professions and is prevalent in contexts in which health professionals are required to interact directly with the public. Objectives: To estimate the burnout syndrome (BOS) prevalence and to identify its associated factors among medical residents. Methods: A descriptive and analytic study conducted during a period from 2012 until 2014, including 184 residents exerting at the two university hospitals of Sfax, Tunisia. Data collection was conducted using an anonymous self-questionnaire, including demographic items and working conditions items. Maslach Burn-out Inventory (MBI) was used to assess BOS. Results: The average age was 25.14 ± 1.47 years. The sex-ratio was 0.65. The majority (154 residents) was single. Over than half (58.2%) of medical residents endure a high emotional exhaustion, 62.5% a high depersonalisation and 12.5% a low personal accomplishment. About eighty percent (79.3%) of them were in burn out with 37% at intermediate and 11.3% at a severe degree. No statistical association was found between the personal characteristics and BOS. Whereas, several factors related to employment status were correlated with the presence of BOS such us: number of working hours > 30 h/week, a number of free weekends < 2/month and a number of days off ≤ 30 days/year. In addition, we found that psychotropic and alcohol consumption were significantly associated to BOS with respectively P = 0.050 and P = 0.002. Conclusion: Burnout is a worrying reality among young doctors. Individual as well as organizational interventions should be targeted to prevention. Disclosure of interest: The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Feki et al. found high emotional fatigue in 58.2%, high depersonalization in 62.5%, and low personal accomplishment in 12.5% of Tunisian medical residents.
“In addition, Feki et al. [37] also discovered high emotional fatigue is experienced by over half (58.2%) of Tunisian medical residents, while high depersonalization was found in 62.5% and low personal accomplishment in 12.5% of cases.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Henchiri, H., Tannoubi, A., Harrathi, C., Boussayala, G., Quansah, F., Hagan, J. E., Mechergui, H., Chaabeni, A., Chebbi, T., Lakhal, T. B., et al. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13020173 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Feki, I., Hentati, S., Sallemi, R., Bahloul, N., Zalila, D., Kammoun, S., & Masmoudi, J.
- Affiliations
- Hopital Universitaire Hedi Chaker (TN)
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S284-S284
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- OpenAlex
- W2727599228
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- burnout, medical residents, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, working hours, psychotropic drug use, alcohol consumption, risk factors, prevalence, physician well-being
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review