Cited by 41Digital Mental Health InterventionsBipolar Disorder and TreatmentMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Beyond symptom monitoring: Consumer needs for bipolar disorder self-management using smartphones

Nicholas, J., Boydell, K., Christensen, H.·2017·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the potential use of smartphone apps to support self-management in young adults with bipolar disorder. Methods: We recruited 89 young adults (18–30 years) with bipolar disorder to complete a cross-sectional online survey. The survey contained quantitative and qualitative questions regarding technology use, current use of disorder-management apps, types of apps desired for disorder management, and app features that users would consider important when selecting apps. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results: Almost all participants used a smartphone daily and 40% currently used apps for disorder management. Of those not currently using apps, 79% indicated they would like to try them. On average, participants rated 61% of the self-management strategies listed as desirable for app support, with sleep-management, understanding early warning signs and triggers, and stay-well plans the most frequently endorsed. App features considered important during app selection were ease-of-use, scientific quality, flexibility/customisation, and data privacy. Conclusions: The results indicate that young adults with bipolar disorder are interested in a wide range of apps for self-management. Participants were interested in apps to support self-management strategies considered clinically important for disorder management. Many of these app needs are currently unmet. Results suggest diversifying and prioritising app capabilities to ensure evidence-based resources for a broader range of app functions are available to consumers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.05.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 41

Authors
Nicholas, J., Boydell, K., & Christensen, H.
Affiliations
Black Dog Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Nicholas, J.
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2017-07
Volume
44
Pages
210-216
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2620991400
Cited by
41
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
bipolar disorder, self-management, mobile application, young adults, customer needs, mental health technology, sleep management, early warning signs, app features, data privacy, ease of use
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Self-Management, Adult, Attitude to Health, Bipolar Disorder, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Telemedicine, Disease Management, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review