Beyond symptom monitoring: Consumer needs for bipolar disorder self-management using smartphones
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the potential use of smartphone apps to support self-management in young adults with bipolar disorder. Methods: We recruited 89 young adults (18–30 years) with bipolar disorder to complete a cross-sectional online survey. The survey contained quantitative and qualitative questions regarding technology use, current use of disorder-management apps, types of apps desired for disorder management, and app features that users would consider important when selecting apps. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results: Almost all participants used a smartphone daily and 40% currently used apps for disorder management. Of those not currently using apps, 79% indicated they would like to try them. On average, participants rated 61% of the self-management strategies listed as desirable for app support, with sleep-management, understanding early warning signs and triggers, and stay-well plans the most frequently endorsed. App features considered important during app selection were ease-of-use, scientific quality, flexibility/customisation, and data privacy. Conclusions: The results indicate that young adults with bipolar disorder are interested in a wide range of apps for self-management. Participants were interested in apps to support self-management strategies considered clinically important for disorder management. Many of these app needs are currently unmet. Results suggest diversifying and prioritising app capabilities to ensure evidence-based resources for a broader range of app functions are available to consumers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Potential app users may also be concerned about unintended disclosure through titles and icons that contain references to the diagnosis.
“and potential app users may also be concerned about unintended disclosure through titles and icons that contain references to the diagnosis (Nicholas et al. 2017b).”
From Evaluating the quality, safety, and functionality of commonly used smartphone apps for bipolar disorder mood and sleep self-management (2022) · cites this paper as Nicholas et al. 2017b
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Nicholas, J., Boydell, K., & Christensen, H.
- Affiliations
- Black Dog Institute (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Nicholas, J.
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 44
- Pages
- 210-216
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- OpenAlex
- W2620991400
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- bipolar disorder, self-management, mobile application, young adults, customer needs, mental health technology, sleep management, early warning signs, app features, data privacy, ease of use
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Self-Management, Adult, Attitude to Health, Bipolar Disorder, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Telemedicine, Disease Management, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review