Cited by 260Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Comparative effectiveness and safety of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Open access
Yuan, JinQiu, Zhang, RenJie, Yang, ZuYao, Lee, Jack, Liu, YaLi, Tian, JinHui, Qin, XiWen, Ren, ZhengJia +4 more·2013·European Urology

Abstract

Context Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) are currently the first-line therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED), but available studies investigating the comparative effects of different PDE5-Is are limited.Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of different classes of oral PDE5-Is for ED.Evidence acquisition A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials that compared different PDE5-Is or PDE5-Is with a placebo for ED. The methodological quality of included studies was appraised with the Cochrane Collaboration bias appraisal tool, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.Evidence synthesis A total of 118 trials (31 195 individuals) were included. There was no major difference in the results between the traditional meta-analysis and the network meta-analysis. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that PDE5-Is were superior to placebo to improve erectile function. Compared with tadalafil (relative risk [RR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.90) and vardenafil (RR: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-0.92), avanafil was less effective on Global Assessment Questionnaire question 1. Tadalafil was more effective than vardenafil (mean difference [MD]: 1.49; 95% CI, 0.50-2.50) and udenafil (MD: -1.84; 95% CI, -3.31 to -0.33) as measured by the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. For all efficacy outcomes, the absolute effects and the rank tests indicated that tadalafil and vardenafil were the most effective agents. After adjusting for dosage, the conclusion remained the same. Safety analysis showed there was no major difference among different agents.Conclusions In recommended doses, oral PDE5-Is are more effective than placebo for ED, and tadalafil seems to be the most effective agent, followed by vardenafil. PDE5-Is are generally safe and well tolerated, and there is no major difference on the safety profile.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although head-to-head studies are lacking, lifestyle interventions appear less effective than PDE5 inhibitors, which increased IIEF scores by 5.66 to 7.49 in a meta-analysis.

    “Although head-to-head studies are lacking, lifestyle interventions appear less effective than PDE5 inhibitors, which increased IIEF scores by 5.66 to 7.49 in a meta-analysis (26).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 260

Authors
Yuan, J., Zhang, R., Yang, Z., Lee, J., Liu, Y., Tian, J., Qin, X., Ren, Z., Ding, H., Chen, Q., Mao, C., & Tang, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Lanzhou University (CN)
  • Southern Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Mao, Chen
Venue
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
63
Issue
5
Pages
902-912
ISSN
0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964632711
Cited by
260
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 6
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lanzhou University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, tadalafil, vardenafil, avanafil, udenafil, comparative effectiveness, drug safety, erectile function, International Index of Erectile Function
MeSH terms
Tadalafil, Sildenafil Citrate, Vardenafil Dihydrochloride, Administration, Oral, Carbolines, Humans, Imidazoles, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Penile Erection, Piperazines, Purines, Risk Factors, Sulfones, Triazines, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review