Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ClearCode34: A Prognostic Risk Predictor for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Open access
Brooks, Samira A., Brannon, A. Rose, Parker, Joel S., Fisher, Jennifer C., Sen, Oishee, Kattan, Michael W., Hakimi, A. Ari, Hsieh, James J., Choueiri, Toni K., Tamboli, Pheroze, Maranchie, Jodi K., Hinds, Peter, Miller, C. Ryan, Nielsen, Matthew E., Rathmell, W. Kimryn·2014·European Urology

Abstract

Background Gene expression signatures have proven to be useful tools in many cancers to identify distinct subtypes of disease based on molecular features that drive pathogenesis, and to aid in predicting clinical outcomes. However, there are no current signatures for kidney cancer that are applicable in a clinical setting. Objective To generate a signature biomarker for the clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) good risk (ccA) and poor risk (ccB) subtype classification that could be readily applied to clinical samples to develop an integrated model for biologically defined risk stratification. Design, setting, and participants A set of 72 ccRCC sample standards was used to develop a 34-gene classifier (ClearCode34) for assigning ccRCC tumors to subtypes. The classifier was applied to RNA-sequencing data from 380 nonmetastatic ccRCC samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and to 157 formalin-fixed clinical samples collected at the University of North Carolina. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed on the individual cohorts to calculate recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Training and test sets were randomly selected from the combined cohorts to assemble a risk prediction model for disease recurrence. Results and limitations The subtypes were significantly associated with RFS (p < 0.01), CSS (p < 0.01), and OS (p < 0.01). Hazard ratios for subtype classification were similar to those of stage and grade in association with recurrence risk, and remained significant in multivariate analyses. An integrated molecular/clinical model for RFS to assign patients to risk groups was able to accurately predict CSS above established, clinical risk-prediction algorithms. Conclusions The ClearCode34-based model provides prognostic stratification that improves upon established algorithms to assess risk for recurrence and death for nonmetastatic ccRCC patients. Patient summary We developed a 34-gene subtype predictor to classify clear cell renal cell carcinoma tumors according to ccA or ccB subtypes and built a subtype-inclusive model to analyze patient survival outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.035

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Brooks, S. A., Brannon, A. R., Parker, J. S., Fisher, J. C., Sen, O., Kattan, M. W., Hakimi, A. A., Hsieh, J. J., Choueiri, T. K., Tamboli, P., Maranchie, J. K., Hinds, P., Miller, C. R., Nielsen, M. E., & Rathmell, W. K.
Venue
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
77-84
ISSN
0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995235833
Cited by
301
References
27
FWCI
16.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ClearCode34: A Prognostic Risk Predictor for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.035
The paper
Brooks, S. A., Brannon, A. R., Parker, J. S., Fisher, J. C., Sen, O., Kattan, M. W., Hakimi, A. A., Hsieh, J. J., Choueiri, T. K., Tamboli, P., Maranchie, J. K., Hinds, P., Miller, C. R., Nielsen, M. E., & Rathmell, W. K. (2014). ClearCode34: A Prognostic Risk Predictor for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.