Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicenter Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

Open access
Zargar, Homayoun, Espiritu, Patrick N., Fairey, Adrian S., Mertens, Laura S., Dinney, Colin P., Mir, Maria C., Krabbe, Laura-Maria, Cookson, Michael S., Jacobsen, Niels-Erik, Gandhi, Nilay M., Griffin, Joshua, Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Vasdev, Nikhil, Yu, Evan Y., Youssef, David, Xylinas, Evanguelos, Campain, Nicholas J., Kassouf, Wassim, Dall’Era, Marc A., Seah, Jo-An, Ercole, Cesar E., Horenblas, Simon, Sridhar, Srikala S., McGrath, John S., Aning, Jonathan, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Wright, Jonathan L., Thorpe, Andrew C., Morgan, Todd M., Holzbeierlein, Jeff M., Bivalacqua, Trinity J., North, Scott, Barocas, Daniel A., Lotan, Yair, Garcia, Jorge A., Stephenson, Andrew J., Shah, Jay B., van Rhijn, Bas W., Daneshmand, Siamak, Spiess, Philippe E., Black, Peter C.·2015·European Urology

Abstract

Background The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) was established primarily with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), with complete response rates (pT0) as high as 38%. However, because of the comparable efficacy with better tolerability of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with metastatic disease, GC has become the most commonly used regimen in the neoadjuvant setting. Objective We aimed to assess real-world pathologic response rates to NAC with different regimens in a large, multicenter cohort. Design, setting, and participants Data were collected retrospectively at 19 centers on patients with clinical cT2–4aN0M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who received at least three cycles of NAC, followed by radical cystectomy (RC), between 2000 and 2013. Intervention NAC and RC Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary outcome was pathologic stage at cystectomy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine factors predictive of pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 stages. Results and limitations Data were collected on 935 patients who met inclusion criteria. GC was used in the majority of the patients (n = 602; 64.4%), followed by MVAC (n = 183; 19.6%) and other regimens (n = 144; 15.4%). The rates of pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 pathologic response were 22.7% and 40.8%, respectively. The rate of pT0N0 disease for patients receiving GC was 23.9%, compared with 24.5% for MVAC (p = 0.2). There was no difference between MVAC and GC in pT0N0 on multivariable analysis (odds ratio: 0.89 [95% confidence interval, 0.61–1.34]; p = 0.6). Conclusions Response rates to NAC were lower than those reported in prospective randomized trials, and we did not discern a difference between MVAC and GC. Without any evidence from randomized prospective trials, the best NAC regimen for invasive BCa remains to be determined. Patient summary There was no apparent difference in the response rates to the two most common presurgical chemotherapy regimens for patients with bladder cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Zargar, H., Espiritu, P. N., Fairey, A. S., Mertens, L. S., Dinney, C. P., Mir, M. C., Krabbe, L.-M., Cookson, M. S., Jacobsen, N.-E., Gandhi, N. M., Griffin, J., Montgomery, J. S., Vasdev, N., Yu, E. Y., Youssef, D., Xylinas, E., Campain, N. J., Kassouf, W., Dall’Era, M. A., Seah, J.-A., Ercole, C. E., Horenblas, S., Sridhar, S. S., McGrath, J. S., Aning, J., Shariat, S. F., Wright, J. L., Thorpe, A. C., Morgan, T. M., Holzbeierlein, J. M., Bivalacqua, T. J., North, S., Barocas, D. A., Lotan, Y., Garcia, J. A., Stephenson, A. J., Shah, J. B., van Rhijn, B. W., Daneshmand, S., Spiess, P. E., & Black, P. C.
Venue
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
241-249
ISSN
0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103725052
Cited by
294
References
1
FWCI
20.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.007
The paper
Zargar, H., Espiritu, P. N., Fairey, A. S., Mertens, L. S., Dinney, C. P., Mir, M. C., Krabbe, L.-M., Cookson, M. S., Jacobsen, N.-E., Gandhi, N. M., Griffin, J., Montgomery, J. S., Vasdev, N., Yu, E. Y., Youssef, D., Xylinas, E., Campain, N. J., Kassouf, W., Dall’Era, M. A., . . . Black, P. C. (2015). Multicenter Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.