The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators
Open accessAbstract
Context: Urologists regularly develop clinical risk prediction models to support clinical decisions. In contrast to traditional performance measures, decision curve analysis (DCA) can assess the utility of models for decision making. DCA plots net benefit (NB) at a range of clinically reasonable risk thresholds. Objective: To provide recommendations on interpreting and reporting DCA when evaluating prediction models. Evidence acquisition: We informally reviewed the urological literature to determine investigators’ understanding of DCA. To illustrate, we use data from 3616 patients to develop risk models for high-grade prostate cancer (n = 313, 9%) to decide who should undergo a biopsy. The baseline model includes prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination; the extended model adds two predictors based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Evidence synthesis: We explain risk thresholds, NB, default strategies (treat all, treat no one), and test tradeoff. To use DCA, first determine whether a model is superior to all other strategies across the range of reasonable risk thresholds. If so, that model appears to improve decisions irrespective of threshold. Second, consider if there are important extra costs to using the model. If so, obtain the test tradeoff to check whether the increase in NB versus the best other strategy is worth the additional cost. In our case study, addition of TRUS improved NB by 0.0114, equivalent to 1.1 more detected high-grade prostate cancers per 100 patients. Hence, adding TRUS would be worthwhile if we accept subjecting 88 patients to TRUS to find one additional high-grade prostate cancer or, alternatively, subjecting 10 patients to TRUS to avoid one unnecessary biopsy. Conclusions: The proposed guidelines can help researchers understand DCA and improve application and reporting. Patient summary: Decision curve analysis can identify risk models that can help us make better clinical decisions. We illustrate appropriate reporting and interpretation of decision curve analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Macaskill, P., Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Ransohoff, D. F., & Collins, G. S. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-0698 · Cited by 5,147
Self-citationVickers, A. J., Van Calster, B., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i6 · Cited by 1,163
Self-citationA calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data
Van Calster, B., Nieboer, D., Vergouwe, Y., De Cock, B., Pencina, M. J., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.005 · Cited by 910
Self-citationCollins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G., & Moons, K. G. M. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025 · Cited by 439
Calibration of Risk Prediction Models: Impact on Decision-Analytic Performance
Van Calster, B., & Vickers, A. J. (2015) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x14547233 · Cited by 371
Cited by
Christodoulou, E., Ma, J., Collins, G. S., Steyerberg, E. W., Verbakel, J. Y., & Van Calster, B. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004 · Cited by 2,119
Self-citationDecision curve analysis to evaluate the clinical benefit of prediction models
Vickers, A. J., & Holland, F. (2021) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.024 · Cited by 394
Self-citationKessler, R. C., Bossarte, R. M., Luedtke, A., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Zubizarreta, J. R. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0531-0 · Cited by 234
Developing an optimal short-form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Zuromski, K. L., Ustun, B., Hwang, I., Keane, T. M., Marx, B. P., Stein, M. B., Ursano, R. J., & Kessler, R. C. (2019) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22942 · Cited by 206
Verbakel, J. Y., Steyerberg, E. W., Uno, H., De Cock, B., Wynants, L., Collins, G. S., & Van Calster, B. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.028 · Cited by 138
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Calster, B., Wynants, L., Verbeek, J. F. M., Verbakel, J. Y., Christodoulou, E., Vickers, A. J., Roobol, M. J., & Steyerberg, E. W.
- Venue
- European Urology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 796-804
- ISSN
- 0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2890840903
- Cited by
- 1,271
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 43.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.038
- The paper
- Van Calster, B., Wynants, L., Verbeek, J. F. M., Verbakel, J. Y., Christodoulou, E., Vickers, A. J., Roobol, M. J., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2018). Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.