Subtle social cues, explicit incentives, and cooperation in social dilemmas
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Boone, C., Declerck, C. H., & Suetens, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Declerck, Carolyn H.
- Venue
- Evolution and Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 179-188
- ISSN
- 1090-5138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148316951
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Evolution and Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Universiteit Antwerpen
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
- Keywords
- cooperation, social cues, incentive structures, social dilemmas, mixed-motive games, repeated games, synergistic effect, social information, teamwork, expectations of others
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
