Evolution of parochial altruism by multilevel selection
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A belief or behaviour within religious and/or spiritual cultural complexes need only promote individuals' tendencies to take on a cost for the benefit of their focal group in order to produce cooperation and its associated prosocial effects (parochial altruism).
“Similarly, a belief or behaviour within religious and/or spiritual cultural complexes need only promote individuals' tendencies to take on a cost for the benefit of their focal group in order for it to produce cooperation and its associated prosocial effects (a phenomenon known as parochial altruism: García and van den Bergh 2011; Choi and Bowles 2007; Norenzayan et al. 2016b).”
From Cultural Evolution of Religion, Spirituality and Ritual: Impacts On Human Cooperation (2024) · cites this paper as García and van den Bergh 2011
Cites
The interaction of TIGIT with PVR and PVRL2 inhibits human NK cell cytotoxicity
Stanietsky, N., Simic, H., Arapovic, J., Toporik, A., Levy, O., Novik, A., Levine, Z., Beiman, M., Dassa, L., Achdout, H., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0903474106 · Cited by 3,524 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis
Balliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037737 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Rusch, H. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1539 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Cultural Evolution of Religion, Spirituality and Ritual: Impacts On Human Cooperation
McNamara, R. A. (2024) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-024-00937-3 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“…need only promote individuals’ tendencies to take on a cost for the benefit of their focal group in order for it to produce cooperation and its associated prosocial effects (a phenomenon known as parochial altruism: García and van den Bergh 2011; Choi and Bowles 2007; Norenzayan et al. 2016b).”
- Authors
- García, J., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.
- Venue
- Evolution and Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 277-287
- ISSN
- 1090-5138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097427563
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 13.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evolution and Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- parochial altruism, multilevel selection, prisoner's dilemma, in-group favoritism, out-group discrimination, product assortment, group conflict, cooperation, altruism, absorbing Markov chains, evolution of cooperation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review