Hormonal contraceptive use lowers female intrasexual competition in pair-bonded women
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Cobey, K. D., Klipping, C., & Buunk, A. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Cobey, Kelly D.
- Venue
- Evolution and Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 294-298
- ISSN
- 1090-5138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970007727
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Evolution and Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- hormonal contraception, pair bonding, menstrual cycle, fertility status, relationship stability, women's reproductive behavior, relationship satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review