The combination of IGF1 and FGF2 and the induction of excessive ocular growth and extreme myopia
Open accessAbstract
Different growth factors have been shown to influence the development of form-deprivation myopia and lens-induced ametropias. However, growth factors have relatively little effect on the growth of eyes with unrestricted vision. We investigate whether the combination of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) influence ocular growth in eyes with unrestricted vision. Different doses of IGF1 and FGF2 were injected into the vitreous chamber of postnatal chicks. Measurements of ocular dimensions and intraocular pressure (IOP) were made during and at the completion of different treatment paradigms. Histological and immunocytochemical analyses were performed to assess cell death, cellular proliferation and integrity of ocular tissues. Treated eyes had significant increases in equatorial diameter and vitreous chamber depth. With significant variability between individuals, IGF1/FGF2-treatment caused hypertrophy of lens and ciliary epithelia, lens thickness was increased, and anterior chamber depth was decreased. Treated eyes developed myopia, in excess of 15 diopters of refractive error. Shortly after treatment, eyes had increased intraocular pressure (IOP), which was increased in a dose-dependent manner. Seven days after treatment with IGF1 and FGF2 changes to anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and elevated IOP were reduced, whereas increases in the vitreous chamber were persistent. Some damage to ganglion cells was detected in peripheral regions of the retina at 7 days after treatment. We conclude that the extreme myopia in IGF1/FGF2-treated eyes results from increased vitreous chamber depth, decreased anterior chamber depth, and changes in the lens. We propose that factor-induced ocular enlargement and myopia result from changes to the sclera, lens and anterior chamber depth.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Müller glia in the postnatal chick retina can be induced to proliferate by intravitreal injection of insulin/FGF2 or IGF-1/FGF2.
“We were intrigued by reports that MG in the postnatal chick retina could be induced to proliferate in response to intravitreal injection of insulin/FGF2 or IGF-1/FGF2 (Fischer et al., 2002; Fischer and Reh, 2002; Ritchey et al., 2012).”
From Retinal injury, growth factors, and cytokines converge on β-catenin and pStat3 signaling to stimulate retina regeneration (2014) · cites this paper as Ritchey et al., 2012
Insulin, IGF-1, and FGF-2 stimulate Müller glia proliferation in the postnatal chick retina.
“Interestingly, Insulin, IGF-1 and FGF-2 stimulate MG proliferation in the postnatal chick retina (Fischer et al., 2002; Ritchey et al., 2012).”
From Retinal injury, growth factors, and cytokines converge on β-catenin and pStat3 signaling to stimulate retina regeneration (2014) · cites this paper as Ritchey et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Ritchey, E. R., Zelinka, C. P., Tang, J., Liu, J., & Fischer, A. J.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, Andy J.
- Venue
- Experimental Eye Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 99
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0014-4835 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3407340
- OpenAlex
- W2050959884
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Experimental Eye Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Eye Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Ocular Disorders and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- insulin-like growth factor I, fibroblast growth factor 2, eye growth, myopia, vitreous chamber depth, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, sclera, retinal ganglion cell damage, intravitreal injection, refractive error
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Newborn, Anterior Chamber, Chickens, Ciliary Body, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Combinations, Eye, Hypertrophy, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Intraocular Pressure, Lens, Crystalline, Organ Size, Receptor, Insulin, Retina, RNA, Messenger, Fibroblast Growth Factor 2, Apoptosis, Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Receptor, IGF Type 1, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Retinoscopy, Myopia, Degenerative, Cell Proliferation, Intravitreal Injections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review