Cited by 40Circadian rhythm and melatoninGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Age-related change and its sex differences in histoarchitecture of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus of F344/N rats

Tsukahara, Shinji, Tanaka, Shin, Ishida, Kouzo, Hoshi, Nobuhiko, Kitagawa, Hiroshi·2005·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

The present study examined the effects of aging and sex differences on the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of F344/N rats. In juveniles (1.6-1.9 months of age), adults (11.7-16.3 months of age), and old (29.2-34 months of age) rats, the volume, size of neuronal nucleus and neuronal cell number of the SCN were determined with cresyl fast violet-stained sections. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis was performed for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). There was no significant effect of aging and sex differences on the SCN volume. The number of neurons in the SCN gradually decreased from juvenile to old age in females. However, in males, the number was significantly decreased in adult and old age rats. The size of neuronal nuclei in the SCN was significantly decreased by increasing age in both sexes, except for the ventrolateral part of the SCN of males. In the dorsomedial part of the SCN of females, the density of GFAP-immunoreactive components was significantly higher in adult age rats than in rats of other ages. However, there was no significant increase in the density of the SCN in adult males. These results suggest that morphological changes in neuronal and astroglial cells occur in the SCN with aging in a sex-specific manner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2004.10.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of vasopressin-expressing cells in the SCN in humans and rodents reduces with age, possibly altering SCN output.

    “The number of vasopressin-expressing cells in the SCN in humans243,244 and rodents245,246 reduces with age, possibly altering SCN output.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 40

Authors
Tsukahara, S., Tanaka, S., Ishida, K., Hoshi, N., & Kitagawa, H.
Affiliations
Kobe University (JP)
Corresponding author
Tsukahara, Shinji
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
147-155
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090692630
Cited by
40
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
suprachiasmatic nucleus, hypothalamus, aging, sex differences, neuron number, glial fibrillary acidic protein, astrocytes, F344/N rats
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Cell Count, Female, Gender Identity, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Neurons, Rats, Inbred F344, Suprachiasmatic Nucleus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review