Cited by 84Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsDietary Effects on HealthAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Genetic dissection of dietary restriction in mice supports the metabolic efficiency model of life extension

Open access
Rikke, Brad A., Liao, Chen-Yu, McQueen, Matthew B., Nelson, James F., Johnson, Thomas E.·2010·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

Dietary restriction (DR) has been used for decades to retard aging in rodents, but its mechanism of action remains an enigma. A principal roadblock has been that DR affects many different processes, making it difficult to distinguish cause and effect. To address this problem, we applied a quantitative genetics approach utilizing the ILSXISS series of mouse recombinant inbred strains. Across 42 strains, mean female lifespan ranged from 380 to 1070days on DR (fed 60% of ad libitum [AL]) and from 490 to 1020days on an AL diet. Longevity under DR and AL is under genetic control, showing 34% and 36% heritability, respectively. There was no correlation between lifespans on DR and AL; thus different genes modulate longevity under the two regimens. DR lifespans are significantly correlated with female fertility after return to an AL diet after various periods of DR (R=0.44, P=0.006). We assessed fuel efficiency (FE, ability to maintain growth and body weight independent of absolute food intake) using a multivariate approach and found it to be correlated with longevity and female fertility, suggesting possible causality. We found several quantitative trait loci responsible for these traits, mapping to chromosomes 7, 9, and 15. We present a metabolic model in which the anti-aging effects of DR are consistent with the ability to efficiently utilize dietary resources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2010.04.008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even among highly genetically similar strains of yeast or mice, dietary restriction is equally likely to shorten lifespan as to extend lifespan.

    “Even among highly genetically similar strains of yeast or mice, dietary restriction is equally likely to shorten lifespan as to extend lifespan.76,77,78”

    From Asynchronous, contagious and digital aging (2021) · cites this paper as [77]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 84

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Merry BJ Bittle AH Collins KJ 1986 Dietary manipulation of ageing: an animal model The Biology of Human Ageing Cambridge University Press 233 242

Authors
Rikke, B. A., Liao, C.-Y., McQueen, M. B., Nelson, J. F., & Johnson, T. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rikke, Brad A.
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
691-701
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051945197
Cited by
84
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG024354)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD060726)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
dietary restriction, lifespan extension, longevity, aging, female fertility, fuel economy, quantitative trait loci, heritability, weight maintenance
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Diet, Reducing, Female, Fertility, Hair, Humans, Life Expectancy, Longevity, Male, Mice, Inbred Strains, Models, Biological, Rodentia, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review