Effects of high-speed power training on functional capacity and muscle performance in older women
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of 12 weeks high-speed power training on isometric contraction (handgrip strength), maximal strength (1RM), muscle power (walking velocity, counter movement jump and ball throwing) and functional tasks of the arm and leg muscles (sit-to-stand and get-up and go). Fifty-six older women were divided into an experimental group and a control group [EG, n=28, 62.5 (5.4) years; CG: n=28, 62.5 (4.3) years]. The EG was submitted to a high-speed power training that consisted of 40% of one repetition maximum (1<RM) to 75% of 1RM); 3 sets 4-12 reps, countermovement jump and medicine ball (1.5 kg) throwing. Over the 12-week training period, the EG significantly increased dynamic and isometric strength performance (57% to 61%), muscle power (range from 14% to 40%) (P<0.05) and function (P<0.05). No significant magnitudes of increase were observed in the CG. These data indicate that high-speed power training is an effective exercise approach leading to large gains in upper and lower extremity muscle performance and function capacity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple studies support the utility of both TRT and HVPT for improving functional performance in older adults.
“While multiple studies support the utility of both TRT and HVPT for improving functional performance in older adults, 29,34 -40 the relative effect of each training modality on functional performance is likely to be task speci fi c. 41”
From High-velocity power training has similar effects to traditional resistance training for functional performance in older adults: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 29 · Cited by 146
- Authors
- Pereira, A., Izquierdo, M., Silva, A. J., Costa, A. M., Bastos, E., González-Badillo, J. J., & Marques, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT)
- University of Beira Interior (PT)
- Venue
- Experimental Gerontology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 250-255
- ISSN
- 0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077364763
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 14.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior
- European Social Fund
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- older women, muscle power, functional capacity, grip strength, one-repetition maximum, countermovement jump, medicine ball throwing, sit-to-stand, resistance training, aging
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aging, Anthropometry, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Middle Aged, Walking, Muscle, Skeletal, Hand Strength, Muscle Strength
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review