Cited by 38Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

Gene-diet interactions and aging in C. elegans

Open access
Yen, Chia An, Curran, Sean P.·2016·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

Diet is the most variable aspect of life history, as most individuals have a large diversity of food choices, varying in the type and amount that they ingest. In the short-term, diet can affect metabolism and energy levels. However, in the long run, the net deficiency or excess of calories from diet can influence the progression and severity of age-related diseases. An old and yet still debated question is: how do specific dietary choices impact health- and lifespan? It is clear that genetics can play a critical role - perhaps just as important as diet choices. For example, poor diet in combination with genetic susceptibility can lead to metabolic disorders, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. Recent work in Caenorhabditis elegans has identified the existence of diet-gene pairs, where the consequence of mutating a specific gene is only realized on specific diets. Many core metabolic pathways are conserved from worm to human. Although only a handful of these diet-gene pairs has been characterized, there are potentially hundreds, if not thousands, of such interactions, which may explain the variability in the rates of aging in humans and the incidence and severity of age-related diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2016.02.012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 143 · Cited by 38

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hansen M New genes tied to endocrine, metabolic, and dietary regulation of lifespan from a Caenorhabditis elegans genomic RNAi screen PLoS Genet 2005b 1 1 e17 PMC1183531 16103914

Authors
Yen, C. A., & Curran, S. P.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Curran, Sean P.
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
86
Pages
106-112
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2277288473
Cited by
38
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R00AG032308)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM109028)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
gene-diet interaction, aging, Caenorhabditis elegans, lifespan, age-related diseases, food choice, metabolic pathways, obesity, type 2 diabetes, genetic susceptibility
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Diet, Eating, Forecasting, Genes, Insulin, Signal Transduction, Caenorhabditis elegans, Caloric Restriction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review