Cited by 5Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Movement velocity during high- and low-velocity resistance exercise protocols in older adults.

Open access
Richardson, Darren L., Duncan, Michael J., Jimenez, Alfonso, Jones, Victoria M., Juris, Paul M., Clarke, Neil D.·2018·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

The primary aim of the present study was to determine the actual movement velocity of high-velocity, low-load (HVLL) and low-velocity, high-load (LVHL) resistance exercise in a group of older adults. The secondary aim was to examine the differences in velocities produced between male and females. In a crossover study design, four males (age: 67±3years) and five females (age: 68±2years) completed three sets of leg press, calf raise, leg curl, leg extension, chest press, seated row, bicep curl and tricep extension on six separate occasions (three HVLL and three LVHL sessions). The command "as fast as possible" was given for the concentric phase of HVLL, and 2s using a 60-bpm metronome controlled the concentric phase during LVHL. Participants had three days of recovery between each session, and a 7-day period before crossing over to the other protocol. Movement velocity was measured during the concentric and eccentric phases of resistance exercise using two-dimensional video analysis. The concentric phases for all exercises were significantly faster (P<0.001) during HVLL compared to LVHL. Furthermore, males produced significantly greater velocities than females during the concentric phase of the chest press, seated row, bicep curl, and tricep extension for both HVLL and LVHL (P<0.05). These protocols provide a simple solution for exercise professionals to ensure that older adults are training at desired velocities when carrying out resistance exercise, without the need for equipment that measures velocity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2017.09.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 5

Authors
Richardson, D. L., Duncan, M. J., Jimenez, A., Jones, V. M., Juris, P. M., & Clarke, N. D.
Affiliations
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Richardson, Darren L.
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
107
Pages
140-147
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2757917026
Cited by
5
References
50
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
movement speed, resistance training, older adults, sex differences, concentric phase, eccentric phase, exercise prescription, video-based motion analysis
MeSH terms
Aged, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Muscle Contraction, Cross-Over Studies, Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review