Cited by 146Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyNutrition and Health in Aging

Effect of resistance training on muscle strength and rate of force development in healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Open access
Guizelini, Pedrode Camargo, de Aguiar, Rafael Alves, Denadai, Benedito Sérgio, Caputo, Fabrizio, Greco, Camila Coelho·2018·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

Rapid force capacity, identified by rate of rise in contractile force at the onset of contraction, i.e., the rate of force development (RFD), has been considered an important neuromuscular parameter of physical fitness in elderly individuals. Randomized control studies conducted in adults have found that resistance training may elicit different outcomes in terms of RFD and muscle strength. Thus, the main purpose of this study was to review systematically the literature for studies regarding the influence of resistance training on muscle strength and RFD in elderly persons. A literature search was performed in major electronic databases from inception to March 2017. Studies including health individuals with a mean age≥60years, describing the effect of resistance training on RFD and muscle strength were found eligible. The outcomes were calculated as the difference in percentage change between control and experimental groups (% change) and data were presented as mean±95% confidence limits. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model and, in addition, simple and multiple meta-regression analyses were used to identify effects of age, training type, sessions per week and training duration on % change in RFD and muscle strength. Thirteen training effects were collected from 10 studies included in the meta-analysis. The resistance training program had a moderate beneficial effect on both muscle strength (% change=18.40%, 95% CL 13.69-23.30, p<0.001) and RFD (% change=26.68, 95% CL 14.41-35.52, p<0.001). Results of the meta-regression revealed that the variables age, training type (i.e., strength and explosive), training duration (4-16weeks) and sessions per week had no significant effects on muscle strength and RFD improvement. Moreover, there was no significant relationship (p=0.073) between the changes in muscle strength and RFD. It can be concluded that explosive training and heavy strength training are effective resistance training methods aiming to improve both muscle strength and RFD after short-to-medium training period. However, muscle strength and RFD seem to adapt differently to resistance training programs, suggesting caution for their interchangeable use in clinical assessments of the elderly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2017.11.020

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 146

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rothstein, H., Sutton, A., Borenstein, M., 2005. Publication Bias in meta-analysis. The Trim and Fill Method. Wiley, West Sussex.
  2. Young, W.B., Bilby, G.E., 1993. The effect of voluntary effort to influence speed of con- traction on strength, muscular power, and hypertrophy development. J. Strength Cond. Res. 7 (3), 172-178.

Authors
Guizelini, P. C., de Aguiar, R. A., Denadai, B. S., Caputo, F., & Greco, C. C.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Corresponding author
Greco, Camila Coelho
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
102
Pages
51-58
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770095062
Cited by
146
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
resistance training, muscle strength, rate of force development, older adults, aging, explosive training, neuromuscular adaptation, training duration, physical fitness
MeSH terms
Healthy Aging, Adaptation, Physiological, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Time Factors, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review