The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The devolution of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this paper is to present a brief historical analysis of the Australian mining industry and the development of its social licence to operate. Commencing with the discovery of coal in the 18th century, to gold and copper and base metals in the 19th century, to the world class iron ore, mineral sands and diamond mines of the 20th century to the current day, the paper will attempt to determine how and why an industry, formerly well-respected by the public, is considered to be a pariah in the eyes of many sections of society. The theory of social licence and its use in the Australian minerals industry is briefly described and a working definition of "an honest, transparent engagement resulting in a beneficial outcome to all parties before, during and after mining" is adopted throughout the paper. Case studies illustrating examples where mining operations were, and continue to be sustained for decades, provide clear evidence of having a social licence to operate. On the other hand, examples are provided illustrating where poor environmental management practices, tailings dam failures, disputes with landowners, and/or government intervention have resulted in the loss of the social licence and early, unplanned closure. The paradox is that despite the industry's acknowledged contribution to the Australian economy, particularly in times of global ructions such as the GFC and the current coronavirus pandemic, there is considerable antipathy towards the industry by the public. Furthermore, the Australian mining industry's approach to environmental management and sustainable development is regularly used as a model for emerging mining economies. The industry has pioneered remediation and rehabilitation on challenging sites, including prime agricultural land, forests, riverine and beach environments. Successes are rarely acknowledged however but failures are highlighted, by the media, opponents of the industry, and governments. Clearly, the business as usual approach is not enough. Mining industry leaders need to take strong measures to ensure the industry is sustainable and maintains its social licence including eliminating all fatalities and serious injuries, ensuring the safety and stability of tailings storage facilities, accelerating progressive rehabilitation particularly on open cut coal mines, successfully closing mines, and lifting the environmental performance of all mines, not just a few.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 2012, Sagittarius encounters tampakan road block, Eng. Min. J., 213, 16
- 2013, Dominican republic, Caribbean Update, 29, 7
- Audet, 2013, ‘Structural development of vegetation on rehabilitated North Stradbroke Island: above/belowground feedback may facilitate alternative ecological outcomes’, Ecol. Process., 2, 1, 10.1186/2192-1709-2-20 · DOI
- Bandler, 1987, Gordon below Franklin dam, Tasmania, Australia: environmental factors in a decision of national significance, Environmentalist, 7, 43, 10.1007/BF02277205 · DOI
- Bice, 2014, What gives you a social licence? An exploration of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry, Resources, 3, 62, 10.3390/resources3010062 · DOI
- Coaldrake, 1979, Coastal sandmining and landscape rehabilitation in eastern Australia, Landsc. Plann., 3, 359, 10.1016/0304-3924(79)90038-8 · DOI
- Cottle, 2014, ‘Open-cut coal mining in Australia’s hunter valley: sustainability and the industry’s economic, ecological and social implications’, Int. J. Rural Law Policy, 1, 35
- Deans, 1991, Strength in diversity’, Far East. Econ. Rev., 154, 60
- Duffy, 2012, Funds for derelict mines “substantially inadequate”, Aust. Min.
- Gorey, 2016, ‘Critical elements in implementing fundamental change in public environmental policy: Western Australia’s mine closure and rehabilitation securities reform, Aust. J. Environ. Manag., 23, 370, 10.1080/14486563.2016.1179227 · DOI
- Graetz, 2015, Ranger Uranium Mine and the Mirarr (Part 1), 1970-2000: the risks of ‘riding roughshod’, Extract. Ind. Soc., 2, 132, 10.1016/j.exis.2014.10.004 · DOI
- Hagemann, 2014, Horse breeders lash out against coal development in the Hunter Valley, Aust. Min.
- Hunt, 2003, The 1960S: the dawn of environmental awareness, Water Environ. Technol., 15, 54
- Jones, 2012, Sustainability and waste management in the resource industries, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51, 10057, 10.1021/ie202963z · DOI
- Laurence, 2011, ‘Establishing a sustainable mining operation: an overview’, J. Clean. Prod., 19, 278, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.019 · DOI
- Lewis, 1980, Environmental aspects of mineral sand mining in Australia, Min. Environ., 2, 145, 10.1007/BF02087020 · DOI
- Li, 2018, Acid mine drainage remediation strategies: a review on migration and source controls, Min. Metall. Process., 35, 148
- Lodhia, 2012, Web based social and environmental communication in the Australian minerals industry: an application of media richness framework, J. Clean. Prod., 25, 73, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.040 · DOI
- McGregor, 1998, Ruralness, development and democracy: media, myths and the creation of meaning at Lake Cowal, New South Wales, Aust. Geogr., 29, 191, 10.1080/00049189808703214 · DOI
- Moffat, 2016, The social licence to operate: a critical review, Forestry, 89, 477, 10.1093/forestry/cpv044 · DOI
- Mudd, 2005, The legacy of early uranium efforts in Australia: from Radium Hill to the atomic bomb and today, Hist. Rec. Aust. Sci., 16, 169, 10.1071/HR05013 · DOI
- Osborne, 2019, Saving and conserving the caves: reflections on 37 years of listings, disputes, submissions and court cases, Aust. J. Earth Sci.s, 66, 767, 10.1080/08120099.2018.1489895 · DOI
- Prno, 2012, Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: perspectives from governance and sustainability theories, Resour. Policy, 37, 346, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002 · DOI
- Rutherford, 2014, Automation in mining, Mater. World, 22, 36
- Saunders, 2015, ‘South32 reviews tailings dams after BHP’s Brazil disaster’, TAust, Financ, Rev,
- Soeberg, 2018, ‘Australia’s ongoing legacy of asbestos: significant challenges remain even after the complete banning of asbestos almost fifteen years ago’, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15, 10.3390/ijerph15020384 · DOI
- The Weekend Australian magazine 2020 ‘Coal is King’ May 2/3 2020 pp. 18-21.
- Whitehouse, 1991, East Australian rain-forests: a case-study in resource harvesting and conservation, Environ. Conserv., 18, 33, 10.1017/S0376892900021263 · DOI
- Zhang, 2015, ‘Understanding the social licence to operate of mining at the national scale: a comparative study of Australia, China and Chile’, J. Clean. Prod., 108, 1063, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.097 · DOI
- Zorn, 2018, Despite our best intentions: Papua New Guinea’s Ok Tedi mine and the limits of expert advice, Min. Econ., 31, 13, 10.1007/s13563-017-0111-1 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Laurence, D.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Laurence, David
- Venue
- The Extractive Industries and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 100742
- ISSN
- 2214-790X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7327457
- OpenAlex
- W3038795794
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Extractive Industries and Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Mining and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Engineering and Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- social license to operate, Australian mining industry, mining history, environmental management, tailings dam failure, mine closure, sustainable development, mine reclamation, remediation, open-pit coal mine, mine safety, public perception of mining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The devolution of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.exis.2020.05.021
- The paper
- Laurence, D. (2021). The devolution of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry. The Extractive Industries and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.05.021