The political ecology of justice outcomes of lithium mining: The case of Salar del Hombre Muerto, Argentina
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Competition for water resources among mining companies, local communities, and the environment is not entirely fair, with national, regional, and local governments openly promoting this activity with benefits.
“Competition for water resources among mining companies, local communities, and the environment is not entirely fair, with national, regional, and local governments openly promoting this activity with all sorts of benefits that include tax exemptions, subsidies, maintenance of roads, new natural gas pipes, and infrastructure that is often not available to local populations [77].”
From The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats (2025) · cites this paper as [77]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Escosteguy, M., Ortega Insaurralde, C., Díaz Paz, W. F., Brannstrom, C., Iribarnegaray, M. A., Hufty, M., & Seghezzo, L.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Hoffmann Centre for Global Sustainability (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Escosteguy, Melisa
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Extractive Industries and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 101477
- ISSN
- 2214-790X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399012533
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- The Extractive Industries and Society (publishedVersion)
- Conicet (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- National Scientific and Technical Research Council (PIP 1122020 0100239)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (100017_172698)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Keywords
- lithium mining, energy justice, political ecology, distributive justice, procedural justice, recognition justice, micropolitics, resource extraction, salt pans, Catamarca, Andes, electric mobility, lithium-ion batteries, energy transition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
