Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Blind Protocol and Its Place in Consciousness Research

Schwartz, Stephan A.·2005·EXPLORE
DOI 10.1016/j.explore.2005.04.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.explore.2005.04.013

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. The Histories of Herodotus, trans. George Rawlinson; EH Blakeney. ed. Intro. John Warrington. London: Dent; 1949:1:1:43–49.
  2. Dym, 2005, Divining science, Mephistos
  3. Elgar, 2000, The dowsing detective, ForteanTimes, 133
  4. Garnier, 1692, Philosophical Treatise
  5. De Vallemont, 1693, La Physique occulte, ou, traité de la baguette divinatoire
  6. 1784, Rapport des Commissionaires Chargés par le Roi, de l’Examen du Magnetisme Animal, 19
  7. Green, 2002, The origins of modern clinical research, Clin Orthopaed Rel Res, 405, 311, 10.1097/00003086-200212000-00039 · DOI
  8. Sheldrake, 1999, How widely is blind assessment used in scientific research?, Alter Therap., 5, 388
  9. Watt, 2004, Reporting of blind methods, J Soc Psych Res, 68, 105

Cited by

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Schwartz, S. A.
Venue
EXPLORE
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
284-289
ISSN
1550-8307
DOI
10.1016/j.explore.2005.04.013
Cited by
6
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Blind Protocol and Its Place in Consciousness Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.explore.2005.04.013
The paper
Schwartz, S. A. (2005). The Blind Protocol and Its Place in Consciousness Research. EXPLORE. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2005.04.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.