Effect of the emotional freedom technique on perceived stress, quality of life, and Cortisol salivary levels in tension-type headache sufferers: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the short-term effects of the emotional freedom technique (EFT) on tension-type headache (TTH) sufferers.Design We used a parallel-group design, with participants randomly assigned to the emotional freedom intervention (n = 19) or a control arm (standard care n = 16).Setting The study was conducted at the outpatient Headache Clinic at the Korgialenio Benakio Hospital of Athens.Participants Thirty-five patients meeting criteria for frequent TTH according to International Headache Society guidelines were enrolled.Intervention Participants were instructed to use the EFT method twice a day for two months.Outcome measures Study measures included the Perceived Stress Scale, the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale, and the Short-Form questionnaire-36. Salivary cortisol levels and the frequency and intensity of headache episodes were also assessed.Results Within the treatment arm, perceived stress, scores for all Short-Form questionnaire-36 subscales, and the frequency and intensity of the headache episodes were all significantly reduced. No differences in cortisol levels were found in any group before and after the intervention.Conclusions EFT was reported to benefit patients with TTH. This randomized controlled trial shows promising results for not only the frequency and severity of headaches but also other lifestyle parameters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During acute stress or acute infection, the circadian cortisol rhythm is disturbed and the afternoon and/or midnight cortisol levels do not drop.
“During acute stress16–18 or acute infection,19 20 the rhythm is disturbed and the afternoon and/or midnight cortisol levels do not drop.”
From Diurnal production of cortisol and prediction of treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-month, real-life prospective cohort study (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Bougea, A. M., Spandideas, N., Alexopoulos, E. C., Thomaides, T., Chrousos, G. P., & Darviri, C.
- Affiliations
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- University of Ioannina (GR)
- Hellenic Red Cross (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Darviri, Christina
- Venue
- EXPLORE
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-99
- ISSN
- 1550-8307 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026632247
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- EXPLORE (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Keywords
- Emotional Freedom Technique, tension-type headache, perceived stress, quality of life, salivary cortisol, headache frequency and intensity, health locus of control, complementary therapy
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Complementary Therapies, Emotions, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saliva, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Tension-Type Headache
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review