Cited by 77Migraine and Headache StudiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

Effect of the emotional freedom technique on perceived stress, quality of life, and Cortisol salivary levels in tension-type headache sufferers: a randomized controlled trial

Bougea, Anastasia M., Spandideas, Nick, Alexopoulos, Evangelos C., Thomaides, Thomas, Chrousos, George P., Darviri, Christina·2013·EXPLORE

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the short-term effects of the emotional freedom technique (EFT) on tension-type headache (TTH) sufferers.Design We used a parallel-group design, with participants randomly assigned to the emotional freedom intervention (n = 19) or a control arm (standard care n = 16).Setting The study was conducted at the outpatient Headache Clinic at the Korgialenio Benakio Hospital of Athens.Participants Thirty-five patients meeting criteria for frequent TTH according to International Headache Society guidelines were enrolled.Intervention Participants were instructed to use the EFT method twice a day for two months.Outcome measures Study measures included the Perceived Stress Scale, the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale, and the Short-Form questionnaire-36. Salivary cortisol levels and the frequency and intensity of headache episodes were also assessed.Results Within the treatment arm, perceived stress, scores for all Short-Form questionnaire-36 subscales, and the frequency and intensity of the headache episodes were all significantly reduced. No differences in cortisol levels were found in any group before and after the intervention.Conclusions EFT was reported to benefit patients with TTH. This randomized controlled trial shows promising results for not only the frequency and severity of headaches but also other lifestyle parameters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.explore.2012.12.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 77

Authors
Bougea, A. M., Spandideas, N., Alexopoulos, E. C., Thomaides, T., Chrousos, G. P., & Darviri, C.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University of Ioannina (GR)
  • Hellenic Red Cross (GR)
Corresponding author
Darviri, Christina
Venue
EXPLORE
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
91-99
ISSN
1550-8307 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026632247
Cited by
77
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • EXPLORE (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
Emotional Freedom Technique, tension-type headache, perceived stress, quality of life, salivary cortisol, headache frequency and intensity, health locus of control, complementary therapy
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Complementary Therapies, Emotions, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saliva, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Tension-Type Headache

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review