The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An exploratory investigation of human biofield responses to encountering a sacred object
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: While advances in the Western sciences have increased our understanding of the human biofield, few studies have examined the potential effects of sacred objects on its functioning. DESIGN AND STUDY PARTICIPANTS: This exploratory study examined the effects of a sacred object called the Sri Yantra / Durga Stone on the human biofield. Twelve women and five men were studied on three separate occasions using the Bio-Well device, which purportedly measures aspects of the biofield: baseline (the day before exposure to the sacred object), pre-exposure (immediately prior to exposure to the sacred object), and post-exposure (immediately following exposure to the sacred object). A set of a priori hypotheses examined outcome effects on a set of variables, including multiple physiological systems. RESULTS: The overall Bio-Well energy state (Bio-Well variables are in units of joules) was significantly changed following exposure to the sacred object (p = 0.001). In addition, the cardiovascular, endocrine, musculoskeletal, digestive, urinogenital, and immune system readings showed significant changes (p's<0.003) while the nervous and respiratory system assessments were unchanged. Chakra (defined as a center of vital prana) energy was changed following exposure to the stone (p = 0.001), while chakra alignment was not (p = 0.145). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this exploratory study suggest that short-term human exposure to this particular sacred object had significant effects on aspects of the human biofield.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: Energy Medicine: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Ross, C. L. (2019) · Global Advances in Health and Medicine · doi:10.1177/2164956119831221 · Cited by 16
RetractedConfirmatory factor analysis for applied research
Brown, T. A. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2769 · Cited by 15,621
A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design
Ulrich, R. S., Zimring, C., Zhu, X., DuBose, J. R., Seo, H.-B., Choi, Y.-S., Quan, X., & Joseph, A. (2008) · HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal · doi:10.1177/193758670800100306 · Cited by 1,588
Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2010) · Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12199-009-0086-9 · Cited by 1,116
Lee, J., Park, B.-J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Ohira, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2011) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2010.09.005 · Cited by 517
The Biofield Hypothesis: Its Biophysical Basis and Role in Medicine
Rubik, B. (2002) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/10755530260511711 · Cited by 424
Antonelli, M., Barbieri, G., & Donelli, D. (2019) · International Journal of Biometeorology · doi:10.1007/s00484-019-01717-x · Cited by 271
Ideno, Y., Hayashi, K., Abe, Y., Ueda, K., Iso, H., Noda, M., Lee, J., & Suzuki, S. (2017) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12906-017-1912-z · Cited by 204
Biofield Therapies: Helpful or Full of Hype? A Best Evidence Synthesis
Jain, S., & Mills, P. J. (2009) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-009-9062-4 · Cited by 178
Self-citationBiofield Science and Healing: History, Terminology, and Concepts
Rubik, B., Muehsam, D. J., Hammerschlag, R., & Jain, S. (2015) · Global Advances in Health and Medicine · doi:10.7453/gahmj.2015.038.suppl · Cited by 172
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Rosu, 1988, Mantra and yantra in Indian medicine and alchemy, Anc Sci Life, 8, 20
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Невойт, Г. В., Bumblyte, I., Korpan, A. S., Minser, O., Potyazhenko, M., Iliev, M. T., Vainoras, A., & Ignatov, I. (2024) · Ukrainian Journal of Physics · doi:10.15407/ujpe69.3.190 · Cited by 12
swamy, R. N., B, N. J., Vinu, V., Jois, S. N., & Prasad, K. N. (2024) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103067 · Cited by 7
Pandey, M., Rastogi, K., Pal, R., Gupta, C., Agrawal, M., Chakravarty, R. T., & Zaidi, S. Z. H. (2025) · Annals of Neurosciences · doi:10.1177/09727531251340505 · Cited by 1
Transdisciplinary theory of creative intuition
Gómez-de-Gispert, M., & Andrés, J. P. (2025) · Journal of Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2025.100107 · Cited by 1
Johnson, L. A. (2024) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1006067
Metadata
- Authors
- Barsotti, T. J., Jain, S., Guarneri, M., King, R. P., Vicario, D., & Mills, P. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barsotti, Tiffany J.
- Venue
- EXPLORE
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 689-694
- ISSN
- 1550-8307 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4317821220
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- EXPLORE (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Keywords
- sacred objects, chakras, prana, energy state, physiological responses
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Male, Spirituality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review