Cited by 64Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological diseases and metabolismIron Metabolism and Disorders

Role of dietary iron restriction in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease

Levenson, Cathy W., Cutler, Roy G., Ladenheim, Bruce, Cadet, Jean L., Hare, Joan, Mattson, Mark P.·2004·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that iron chelation may be a useful therapy in the treatment of Parkinson's Disease (PD). Experiments were designed to test the impact of dietary iron availability on the pathogenic process and functional outcome in a mouse model of PD. Mice were fed diets containing low (4 ppm) or adequate (48 ppm) amounts of iron for 6 weeks before the administration of MPTP, a mitochondrial toxin that damages nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons and induces Parkinson-like symptoms. Low dietary iron increased serum total iron binding capacity (P < 0.001). Consistent with neuronal protection, iron restriction increased sphingomyelin C16:0 and decreased ceramide C16:0. However, there was a 35% decrease in striatal dopamine (DA) in iron-restricted mice. Motor behavior was also impaired in these animals. In vitro studies suggested that severe iron restriction could lead to p53-mediated neuronal apoptosis. Administration of MPTP reduced striatal DA (P < 0.01) and impaired motor behavior in iron-adequate mice. However, in iron-restricted mice, striatal dopamine levels and motor behavior were unchanged compared to saline-treated mice. Thus, while reduced iron may provide protection against PD-inducing insults such as MPTP, the role of iron in the synthesis of DA and neuronal survival should be considered, particularly in the development of iron-chelating agents to be used chronically in the clinical setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.08.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced concentrations of systemic iron are associated with an increased risk of Parkinson's disease.

    “Studies have shown that reduced concentrations of systemic iron are associated with an increased risk of Parkinson’s disease.140–142”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 64

Authors
Levenson, C. W., Cutler, R. G., Ladenheim, B., Cadet, J. L., Hare, J., & Mattson, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
Corresponding author
Levenson, Cathy W.
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
190
Issue
2
Pages
506-514
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985717473
Cited by
64
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, dietary iron restriction, iron chelation, MPTP, dopaminergic neurons, striatal dopamine, total iron binding capacity, sphingomyelin, ceramide, p53-dependent apoptosis, motor behavior, iron chelators, mouse model
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Ceramides, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Motor Activity, Neurons, Sphingomyelins, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Apoptosis, Microscopy, Confocal, Iron, Dietary, MPTP Poisoning, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review