Role of dietary iron restriction in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease
Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that iron chelation may be a useful therapy in the treatment of Parkinson's Disease (PD). Experiments were designed to test the impact of dietary iron availability on the pathogenic process and functional outcome in a mouse model of PD. Mice were fed diets containing low (4 ppm) or adequate (48 ppm) amounts of iron for 6 weeks before the administration of MPTP, a mitochondrial toxin that damages nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons and induces Parkinson-like symptoms. Low dietary iron increased serum total iron binding capacity (P < 0.001). Consistent with neuronal protection, iron restriction increased sphingomyelin C16:0 and decreased ceramide C16:0. However, there was a 35% decrease in striatal dopamine (DA) in iron-restricted mice. Motor behavior was also impaired in these animals. In vitro studies suggested that severe iron restriction could lead to p53-mediated neuronal apoptosis. Administration of MPTP reduced striatal DA (P < 0.01) and impaired motor behavior in iron-adequate mice. However, in iron-restricted mice, striatal dopamine levels and motor behavior were unchanged compared to saline-treated mice. Thus, while reduced iron may provide protection against PD-inducing insults such as MPTP, the role of iron in the synthesis of DA and neuronal survival should be considered, particularly in the development of iron-chelating agents to be used chronically in the clinical setting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reduced concentrations of systemic iron are associated with an increased risk of Parkinson's disease.
“Studies have shown that reduced concentrations of systemic iron are associated with an increased risk of Parkinson’s disease.140–142”
From The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders (2014) · cites this paper as [142]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Levenson, C. W., Cutler, R. G., Ladenheim, B., Cadet, J. L., Hare, J., & Mattson, M. P.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- National Institute on Aging (US)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
- Corresponding author
- Levenson, Cathy W.
- Venue
- Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 506-514
- ISSN
- 0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985717473
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, dietary iron restriction, iron chelation, MPTP, dopaminergic neurons, striatal dopamine, total iron binding capacity, sphingomyelin, ceramide, p53-dependent apoptosis, motor behavior, iron chelators, mouse model
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cells, Cultured, Ceramides, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Motor Activity, Neurons, Sphingomyelins, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Apoptosis, Microscopy, Confocal, Iron, Dietary, MPTP Poisoning, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review