The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Growth-associated gene expression after stroke: evidence for a growth-promoting region in peri-infarct cortex
Abstract
Stroke induces axonal sprouting in peri-infarct cortex. A set of growth-associated genes important in axonal sprouting in peripheral nervous system regeneration and cortical development has recently been defined. The expression profiles of these growth-associated genes were defined during the post-stroke axonal sprouting response using a model of stroke in barrel field cortex. Stroke induces sequential waves of neuronal growth-promoting genes during the sprouting response: an early expression peak (SPRR1), a mid expression peak (p21, Ta1 tubulin, L1, MARCKS), a late peak (SCG10, SCLIP), and an early/sustained pattern (GAP43, CAP23, c-jun). These expression peaks correspond to specific time points in the sprouting response. The expression of the growth-inhibiting chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans aggrecan, brevican, versican, and phosphacan are induced late in the sprouting process; except neurocan, which is increased during the peak of the growth-promoting gene expression. The developmentally associated growth inhibitors ephrin-A5, ephB1, semaphorin IIIa, and neuropilin 1 are also induced in the early phases of the sprouting response. At the cellular level, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, in the form of peri-neuronal nets, are reduced in the region of axonal sprouting, during the peak of growth-promoting gene expression. These results identify a unique profile of growth-promoting gene expression in adult cortex after stroke, the inhibitory molecules that are present during the sprouting response, and a region in which growth-promoting genes are increased, growth-inhibitory proteins are diminished and axonal sprouting occurs. This region may be a growth-promoting zone after stroke.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In response to focal cerebral ischaemia, these proteoglycans are downregulated in areas exhibiting axonal growth over a period of 2–3 weeks after stroke.64”
From Promoting brain remodelling and plasticity for stroke recovery: therapeutic promise and potential pitfalls of clinical translation (2012) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“Despite the robust evidence for specific time windows in which neuronal plasticity and angiogenesis are most active,64,66,67 neurorestorative treatments were still successful in animals once brain remodelling was induced months after the stroke.18,20”
From Promoting brain remodelling and plasticity for stroke recovery: therapeutic promise and potential pitfalls of clinical translation (2012) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“focal cortical stroke in rats contributes to upregulation of a number of CSPG-encoding genes particularly near the infarct and glial scar.”
From The Perineuronal ‘Safety’ Net? Perineuronal Net Abnormalities in Neurological Disorders (2018) · cites this paper as Carmichael et al., 2005
In the citing paper
“as well as versican and brevican, both of which peaked by day 28 (Carmichael et al., 2005).”
From The Perineuronal ‘Safety’ Net? Perineuronal Net Abnormalities in Neurological Disorders (2018) · cites this paper as Carmichael et al., 2005
In the citing paper
“RT-PCR analysis of the affected tissue indicated upregulation of neurocan, which peaked on the third day following middle cerebral artery occlusion”
From The Perineuronal ‘Safety’ Net? Perineuronal Net Abnormalities in Neurological Disorders (2018) · cites this paper as Carmichael et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR
Pfaffl, M. W. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 · Cited by 34,610
Pfaffl, M. W. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.9.e36 · Cited by 7,377
Regeneration beyond the glial scar
Silver, J., & Miller, J. H. (2004) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1326 · Cited by 3,151
Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury
Bradbury, E. J., Moon, L. D. F., Popat, R. J., King, V. R., Bennett, G. S., Patel, P. N., Fawcett, J. W., & McMahon, S. B. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416636a · Cited by 2,357
The glial scar and central nervous system repair
Fawcett, J. W., & Asher, R. A. (1999) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(99)00072-6 · Cited by 1,808
Reactivation of Ocular Dominance Plasticity in the Adult Visual Cortex
Pizzorusso, T., Medini, P., Berardi, N., Chierzi, S., Fawcett, J. W., & Maffei, L. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072699 · Cited by 1,679
GAP-43: an intrinsic determinant of neuronal development and plasticity
Benowitz, L. I., & Routtenberg, A. (1997) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(96)10072-2 · Cited by 1,329
Quantitative RT-PCR: Pitfalls and Potential
Freeman, W. M., Walker, S. J., & Vrana, K. E. (1999) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/99261rv01 · Cited by 1,149
Langdale, J. A. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2694-9_18 · Cited by 869
Matrix metalloproteinases in neuroinflammation
Rosenberg, G. A. (2002) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.10108 · Cited by 868
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Li, S., Zheng, J., Carmichel, S.T., in press. Differences in ischemic injury after stroke between aged and young adults. Neurobiol. Dis.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–420 of 420
Shared Transcriptomic Signatures in Perilesional and Contralesional CortexPreprint
Betz, D., Alers, V. A., Kenwood, M. R., Zuurbier, K. R., Coimbra, R., Rhoton, P., Plautz, E. J., Douglas, P. M., Ramirez, D. M. O., Stowe, A. M., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.02.703306
Delattre, C. (2013) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/721eacdez23e3z4347zafcaz96d2d090a715
Azé, O. D. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/98a87fe7z5da1z4bb9z92d3zb9dadc93cffe
Douceau, S. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/6f1007f2z8468z4365zb07dz7d863bf32cd5
Piétri, M. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/3122d414zcceez468bz8e31z83d8dba42e33
King, E., Beros, J. L., Fujiyama, H., Bindoff, A. D., Reynolds, J. N. J., & Tang, A. D. (2026) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcag160 · Cited by 1
Mansour, M. A., Wahid, M., Molla, M. A. S. E., Helmy, M. H., Adel, T. M., Mostafa, H. N., & Elsanafiry, M. S. (2026) · Neuroimage Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100369 · Cited by 1
Shared transcriptomic signatures in perilesional and contralesional cortex after ischemic stroke
Betz, D., Alers, V. A., Kenwood, M. R., Zuurbier, K. R., Coimbra, R., Rhoton, P., Plautz, E. J., Douglas, P. M., Ramirez, D. M. O., Stowe, A. M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-026-03885-1 · Cited by 1
Castillo, J. A., Uppuluri, J., Le, M., Tran, T., Pivetti, C. D., Huang, K., Vatoofy, S., Ratcliff, A., Dangan, A., Bannerman, S., et al. (2026) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000005054
Vitrac, C., Branscheidt, M., Mahmoud, W. J., & Luft, A. R. (2026) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp291416
From Neuroinflammation to Precision Stroke Recovery: A Phase-Specific Immune–Metabolic Framework
Kaewkaen, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark · doi:10.31083/fbl54110
Harris, J. L. (2008) · VCU Scholars Compass (Virginia Commonwealth University) · doi:10.25772/0dqa-d954
The role of the complement system in ischemic stroke and neural plasticity
Stokowska, A. (2013) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Carmichael, S. T., Archibeque, I., Luke, L., Nolan, T., Momiy, J., & Li, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carmichael, S. Thomas
- Venue
- Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 193
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 291-311
- ISSN
- 0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997912239
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS045729)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
- Keywords
- stroke, axonal sprouting, peri-infarct cortex, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, growth inhibitors, ephrin-A5, neuropilin-1, EphB1, GAP-43, c-Jun, neuroplasticity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Chondroitin Sulfates, Disease Models, Animal, Gene Expression Regulation, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Nerve Growth Factors, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans, Proteoglycans, Rats, Inbred F344, RNA, Messenger, Time Factors, Gene Expression, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, In Situ Hybridization, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Brain Infarction, Stroke, Lectins, C-Type, Rats, Aggrecans, Versicans, Receptor-Like Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Class 5
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
