Females remyelinate more efficiently than males following demyelination in the aged but not young adult CNS
Abstract
To assess the effects of sex on CNS remyelination, demyelinating lesions were induced by injection of ethidium bromide into the caudal cerebellar peduncle of Sprague-Dawley rats divided into the following 8 groups: young adult male, young adult female, old adult male and old adult female and each of these in which the gonads had been removed 4 weeks prior to lesion induction. Remyelination was assessed, blinded to grouping, by a ranking analysis using standard morphological criteria. In young adult animals, where remyelination proceeds rapidly, there was no difference in the remyelination at four weeks after lesion induction in male or females regardless of whether they were intact or castrated/ovariectomised. However, in old adult rats, where remyelination proceeds slowly, the extent of oligodendrocyte remyelination was significantly less in males compared to females at 8 weeks after lesion induction. Removal of gonads did not affect remyelination in old rats of either gender. These results indicate a sex-associated divergence in remyelination efficiency that occurs with ageing that is unaffected by the removal of gonadal sources of sex steroid hormones.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature indicates that sex-related differences exist with respect to the efficiency of remyelination: in young rats the rate of remyelination is comparable between the sexes, but it is more efficient in aged female rats as compared to male rats.
“The literature indicates that sex-related differences exist with respect to the efficiency of remyelination: whilst in young rats the rate of remyelination is comparable between the sexes, it is more efficient in aged female rats as compared to male rats44.”
From Tamoxifen accelerates the repair of demyelinated lesions in the central nervous system (2016) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 95
- Authors
- LI, W., PENDERIS, J., ZHAO, C., SCHUMACHER, M., & FRANKLIN, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- FRANKLIN, R
- Venue
- Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 202
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 250-254
- ISSN
- 0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995038117
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Multiple Sclerosis Society
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- remyelination, sex differences, aging, demyelination, ethidium bromide, oligodendrocytes, gonadectomy, ovariectomy, sex hormones, central nervous system
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Castration, Demyelinating Diseases, Ethidium, Female, Male, Myelin Sheath, Nerve Regeneration, Oligodendroglia, Sex Characteristics, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review