The influence of the cage environment on rodent physiology and behavior: Implications for reproducibility of pre-clinical rodent research
Abstract
The reproducibility of pre-clinical research is an important concern that is now being voiced by constituencies that include the National Institutes of Health, the pharmaceutical industry, Congress, the public and the scientific community. An important facet of performing and publishing well-controlled reproducible pre-clinical research is to stabilize and more completely define the environment of the animal subjects. Scientists who use rodents in research generally recognize the importance of maintaining a stable animal environment. However, despite a theoretical and general awareness of these issues, many may lack a true appreciation of how significantly even seemingly minor variations in the environment can affect research outcomes. The purpose of this article is to help investigators gain a more comprehensive and substantiated understanding of the potentially significant impact of even seemingly minor environmental changes on the animals and the data. An important caveat to this article is that the examples presented were selected from a very large literature, admittedly in order to illustrate certain points. The goal of this article is not to provide an overview of the entire literature on how the environment affects rodents but rather to make preclinical scientists more aware of how these factors can potentially influence the experimental data and contribute to poor reproducibility of research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Housing parameters are an experimental variable that can alter experimental outcome.
“Housing parameters are an experimental variable that can alter experimental outcome.18,45,47”
From Ultrasonic Vocalization Analysis as a Novel Metric to Assess Cage Enrichment in Rats (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Toth, L. A.
- Affiliations
- SIU Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Toth, Linda A.
- Venue
- Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 270
- Pages
- 72-77
- ISSN
- 0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081568538
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Keywords
- cage environment, rodent physiology, rodent behavior, reproducibility, preclinical research, animal housing, environmental enrichment, animal welfare
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Housing, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review