Cited by 119Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Microglia and macrophages differ in their inflammatory profile after permanent brain ischemia

Zarruk, Juan G., Greenhalgh, Andrew D., David, Samuel·2018·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

We studied the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules in microglia and infiltrating monocyte-derived macrophages after permanent Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion (pMCAO). LysM-EGFP knock-in mice were used to distinguish between these two cell types, as peripheral myeloid cells are LysM-EGFP + , while microglia are not. This was confirmed with P2ry12 (a microglial specific marker), Iba-1 and EGFP immunostaining. The peak of LysM-EGFP + myeloid cell infiltration was 72h post-ischemia, and were distributed evenly in the lesion core, surrounded by a dense region of microglia. Flow cytometry showed that a higher percentage of microglia expressed TNF-α at 3 (24.3% vs 1.4%) and 7 (18.8% vs 3.4%) days post-pMCAO as compared to infiltrating macrophages. Microglia and macrophages were purified by fluorescence activated cell sorting 72h post-ischemia to assess the mRNA expression of inflammatory markers. Macrophages upregulated expression of mRNA for arginase-1 (Arg-1) by 1000-fold, and IL-1β by 90-fold as compared to microglia. At the protein level, a significantly number of macrophages expressed Arg-1, while few if any microglia expressed Arg-1. However, IL-1β protein was not detected in macrophages by flow cytometry or immunofluorescence labeling of tissue sections. It was, however, detected in astrocytes along the lesion border. A PCR-array screen of 84 inflammatory genes revealed that pro-inflammatory chemokines and cytokines were predominantly upregulated in macrophage…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.08.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The action of TET2 is highly context-specific, with fundamental differences in the regulation of innate immune responses between peripheral immune cells (and specifically monocyte-derived macrophages) and microglia.

    “This effect differs from the result reported here and highlights fundamental differences in the regulation of the innate immune responses between peripheral immune cells (and specifically monocyte-derived macrophages) and microglia (Burm et al., 2015) (London et al., 2013; Zarruk et al., 2018), suggesting that the action of TET2 is highly context-specific.”

    From TET2 Regulates the Neuroinflammatory Response in Microglia (2019) · cites this paper as Zarruk et al., 2018

  • In injured CNS conditions, monocyte-derived macrophages often take a more CNS 'repair/supportive' phenotype than resident microglia under ischemic conditions.

    “This difference in behavior with peripheral macrophages and dendritic cells has been already described in injured CNS conditions where, for instance, monocyte-derived macrophages often take a more CNS 'repair/supportive' phenotype than resident microglia under ischemic conditions (London et al., 2013; Zarruk et al., 2018).”

    From TET2 Regulates the Neuroinflammatory Response in Microglia (2019) · cites this paper as Zarruk et al., 2018

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 119

Authors
Zarruk, J. G., Greenhalgh, A. D., & David, S.
Affiliations
McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
David, Samuel
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
301
Issue
Pt B
Pages
120-132
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2748918690
Cited by
119
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-14828)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
microglia, macrophages, permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion, ischemic stroke, neuroinflammation, arginase-1, IL-1β, TNF-α, chemokines, cytokines, myeloid cell infiltration, astrocytes, inflammatory gene expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Arginase, Brain Ischemia, Chronic Disease, Inflammation, Macrophages, Male, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Cytokines, Microglia, Chemokines, Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks, Interleukin-1beta, Gene Knock-In Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review