Protective effects of Withania somnifera extract in SOD1G93A mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Open accessAbstract
Withania somnifera (WS; commonly known as Ashwagandha or Indian ginseng) is a medicinal plant whose extracts have been in use for centuries in various regions of the world as a rejuvenator. There is now a growing body of evidence documenting neuroprotective functions of the plant extracts or its purified compounds in several models of neurodegenerative diseases including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Based on the extract's beneficial effect in a mouse model of ALS with TDP-43 proteinopathy , the current study was designed to test its efficacy in another model of familial ALS. Our results show that administration of WS extracts by gavage to mice expressing G93A mutant form of superoxide dismutase (SOD1) resulted in increased longevity, improved motor performance and increased number of motor neurons in lumbar spinal cord. The WS treatment caused substantial reduction in levels of misfolded SOD1whereas it enhanced expression of cellular chaperons in spinal cord of SOD1 G93A mice. WS markedly reduced glial activation and prevented phosphorylation of nuclear factor kappaB (NF-κB). The overall immunomodulatory effect of WS was further evidenced by changes in expression of multiple cytokines/chemokines. WS also served as an autophagy inducer which may be beneficial at early stages of the disease. These results suggest that WS extracts might constitute promising therapeutics for treatment of ALS with involvement of misfolded SOD1.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neuroprotective activities of Withania somnifera are well documented by many studies.
“Neuroprotective activities of WS have been well documented by many studies.”
From Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal (Ashwagandha): A comprehensive review on ethnopharmacology, pharmacotherapeutics, biomedicinal and toxicological aspects (2021) · cites this paper as [94]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Dutta, K., Patel, P., & Julien, J.-P.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Julien, Jean-Pierre
- Venue
- Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 309
- Pages
- 193-204
- ISSN
- 0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2885068562
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association
- ALS Society of Canada
- Fondation Brain Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- Withania somnifera, ashwagandha extract, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, SOD1 G93A mice, familial ALS, neuroprotection, motor neuron survival, protein misfolding, molecular chaperones, glial activation, NF-κB phosphorylation, cytokines and chemokines, autophagy, immunomodulation
- MeSH terms
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Animals, Autophagy, Body Weight, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Disease Models, Animal, Ganglia, Spinal, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Microfilament Proteins, Motor Neurons, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Plant Extracts, Psychomotor Performance, Reflex, Spinal Cord, Superoxide Dismutase, Cytokines, Neuroprotective Agents, Withania, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review