Cited by 56Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchPhytochemicals and Medicinal PlantsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Protective effects of Withania somnifera extract in SOD1G93A mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Open access
Dutta, Kallol, Patel, Priyanka, Julien, Jean-Pierre·2018·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Withania somnifera (WS; commonly known as Ashwagandha or Indian ginseng) is a medicinal plant whose extracts have been in use for centuries in various regions of the world as a rejuvenator. There is now a growing body of evidence documenting neuroprotective functions of the plant extracts or its purified compounds in several models of neurodegenerative diseases including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Based on the extract's beneficial effect in a mouse model of ALS with TDP-43 proteinopathy , the current study was designed to test its efficacy in another model of familial ALS. Our results show that administration of WS extracts by gavage to mice expressing G93A mutant form of superoxide dismutase (SOD1) resulted in increased longevity, improved motor performance and increased number of motor neurons in lumbar spinal cord. The WS treatment caused substantial reduction in levels of misfolded SOD1whereas it enhanced expression of cellular chaperons in spinal cord of SOD1 G93A mice. WS markedly reduced glial activation and prevented phosphorylation of nuclear factor kappaB (NF-κB). The overall immunomodulatory effect of WS was further evidenced by changes in expression of multiple cytokines/chemokines. WS also served as an autophagy inducer which may be beneficial at early stages of the disease. These results suggest that WS extracts might constitute promising therapeutics for treatment of ALS with involvement of misfolded SOD1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.expneurol.2018.08.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 56

Authors
Dutta, K., Patel, P., & Julien, J.-P.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Julien, Jean-Pierre
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
309
Pages
193-204
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885068562
Cited by
56
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association
  • ALS Society of Canada
  • Fondation Brain Canada
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Withania somnifera, ashwagandha extract, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, SOD1 G93A mice, familial ALS, neuroprotection, motor neuron survival, protein misfolding, molecular chaperones, glial activation, NF-κB phosphorylation, cytokines and chemokines, autophagy, immunomodulation
MeSH terms
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Animals, Autophagy, Body Weight, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Disease Models, Animal, Ganglia, Spinal, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Microfilament Proteins, Motor Neurons, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Plant Extracts, Psychomotor Performance, Reflex, Spinal Cord, Superoxide Dismutase, Cytokines, Neuroprotective Agents, Withania, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review