Issues affecting the reliability of dynamic dip testing as a method to assess the condensate drainage behavior from the air-side surface of dehumidifying heat exchangers
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In dynamic dip testing, retreating contact angle is the only important factor in surface wettability, whereas contact angle hysteresis is more important in condensing environments.
“(3) In dynamic dip testing, retreating contact angle ( θ R ) is the only important factor in surface wettability, whereas contact angle hys teresis ( θ A θ R ) is more important in condensing environments.”
Condensate formation and drainage characteristics are different for dynamic dip testing and wind tunnel testing.
“According to the results of this experiment, condensate formation and drainage characteristics are different for the two experimental test methods.”
Although dynamic dip testing does not provide an accurate prediction of residual water mass, it can be used to rapidly assess the drainage characteristics of heat exchangers.
“Although dynamic dip testing does not provide an accurate prediction of residual water mass, it can be used to rapidly assess the drainage characteristics of heat exchangers.”
When fin pitch is smaller, droplets retained on the fin surface after dynamic dip testing are smaller and not easy to bridge, but in wind tunnel testing, condensation droplets are prone to bridge and are difficult to remove.
“(2) When the fin pitch is smaller, the droplets retained on the fin surface after the dynamic tip testing are smaller and not easy to bridge, but in the wind tunnel testing, condensation droplets are prone to bridge and are difficult to remove;”
In dynamic dip testing, most water is swept away from the fin surface by volume movement, while in wind tunnel testing, water droplets initially form on the fin surface and then move down due to gravity and shear forces.
“(1) In dynamic dip testing, most water is swept away from the fin surface by volume movement, while in wind tunnel testing, the water droplets initially form on the fin surface and then move down due to gravity and shear forces;”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amer, M., & Wang, C.-C. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.120 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Li, F., Wu, S., Ma, Z., Zhao, R., & Huang, D. (2022) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118220 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Li, Z., Wei, W., Wang, W., Sun, Y., Wang, S., Lin, Y., Huang, C., & Deng, S. (2024) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.122136 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Xiong, T., Liu, G., Gao, Q., Yan, G., & Yu, J. (2023) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105654 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, L., & Jacobi, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Liping
- Venue
- Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1512-1522
- ISSN
- 0894-1777 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127605856
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- LG Electronics
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
- Keywords
- condensate drainage, wettability, receding contact angle, contact angle hysteresis, condensation mechanism, water retention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review