Cited by 25Heat Transfer and Boiling StudiesAdsorption and Cooling SystemsSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

Issues affecting the reliability of dynamic dip testing as a method to assess the condensate drainage behavior from the air-side surface of dehumidifying heat exchangers

Liu, Liping, Jacobi, Anthony M.·2008·Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2008.04.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, L., & Jacobi, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Liping
Venue
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
1512-1522
ISSN
0894-1777 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127605856
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
LG Electronics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Keywords
condensate drainage, wettability, receding contact angle, contact angle hysteresis, condensation mechanism, water retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review