Cited by 30Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFood Quality and Safety StudiesFood composition and properties

Rheological, textural, and functional characteristics of 3D-printed cheesecake containing guava leaf, green tea, and barley sprout powders

Park, Ye-Eun, Kim, Jeong, Kim, Hyun Woo, Chun, Jiyeon·2022·Food Bioscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101634

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, Y.-E., Kim, J., Kim, H. W., & Chun, J.
Affiliations
  • Sunchon National University (KR)
  • Korea University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Kim, Hyun Woo
  • Chun, Jiyeon
Venue
Food Bioscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
47
Pages
101634
ISSN
2212-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4213420169
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Bioscience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Quality and Safety Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
3D food printing, cheesecake, green tea powder, edible ink, rheological properties, shear thinning, shear modulus, water and oil holding capacity, in vitro glycemic index, antioxidant activity, polyphenols, functional food ingredients, printability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review