The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Models of grain quality in wheat—A review
Open accessAbstract
Maintaining grain quality of wheat under climate change is critical for human nutrition, end-use functional properties, as well as commodity value. This paper reviews the current knowledge of high temperature and elevated atmospheric CO2 on whole-grain and functional properties of wheat. It also considers the utility of contemporary crop models for investigating the impacts of climate change on wheat quality; and discusses opportunities for advancing model capability. Under elevated CO2 wheat yield can increase by up to 36%, but universally grain protein concentration decreases and a shift in composition translates to reduced functional properties. High temperature during the post-anthesis period of crops can cause a step change reduction in grain-set, grain size and milling yield. Numerous crop models including APSIM-Nwheat, CropSyst, Sirius, GLAM-HTS account for high CO2 effects through modification of RUE, TE or critical leaf-N concentration and high temperature by accelerated leaf senescence, grain number, potential grain weight or HI modifications. For grain quality, however, crop models are typically restricted to predicting average grain size and grain-N content (concentration), although the SiriusQuality model accounts for the major storage proteins, gliadin and glutenin. For protein composition, high temperature stress reduces the glutenin/gliadin ratio and limits the synthesis of the larger SDS-insoluble glutenin polymers which causes wheat dough to have weaker viscoelasticity properties. This link provides an opportunity to model high temperature effects on grain functional properties. Further development and testing, utilizing grain quality data from global FACE programmes will be particularly valuable for validating and enhancing the performance of such models. For whole-grain characteristics, a single-spike model approach, which accounts for intra-spike variation in assimilate deposition may provide an opportunity to predict grain size distribution and associated screenings percentage and milling yield. Taken together expanding the predictive capability of our crop models to grain quality is an important step in providing a powerful tool for developing adaptation strategies for combating the impacts of climate change to global crop production and grain quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P., & Hanson, C. (2007) · Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Digital Repository (Centre for Environmental Data Analysis) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7356334 · Cited by 9,136
The representative concentration pathways: an overview
van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G. C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J.-F., et al. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z · Cited by 7,741
Watson, R., Albritton, D. L., Barker, T., Baskmakov, I., Canziani, O. F., Christ, R., Ulrich Cubasch, B., Davidson, O., Gitay, H., Griggs, D., et al. (2001) · Cited by 3,473
Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production
Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Martre, P., Rötter, R. P., Lobell, D. B., Cammarano, D., Kimball, B. A., Ottman, M. J., Wall, G. W., White, J. W., et al. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2470 · Cited by 2,491
Self-citationShewry, P. R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp058 · Cited by 1,292
An overview of the crop model stics
Brisson, N., Gary, C., Justes, E., Roche, R., Mary, B., Ripoche, D., Zimmer, D., Sierra, J., Bertuzzi, P., Burger, P., et al. (2003) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00110-7 · Cited by 1,220
Temperatures and the growth and development of wheat: a review
Porter, J. R., & Gawith, M. (1999) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(98)00047-1 · Cited by 1,138
The impact of temperature variability on wheat yields
ASSENG, S., FOSTER, I., & TURNER, N. C. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02262.x · Cited by 1,053
Heat Stress in Wheat during Reproductive and Grain-Filling Phases
Farooq, M., Bramley, H., Palta, J. A., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2011.615687 · Cited by 1,024
Brisson, N., Mary, B., Ripoche, D., Jeuffroy, M. H., Ruget, F., Nicoullaud, B., Gate, P., Devienne-Barret, F., Antonioletti, R., Durr, C., et al. (1998) · Agronomie · doi:10.1051/agro:19980501 · Cited by 817
Metadata
- Authors
- Nuttall, J. G., O'Leary, G. J., Panozzo, J. F., Walker, C. K., Barlow, K. M., & Fitzgerald, G. J.
- Venue
- Field Crops Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 202
- Pages
- 136-145
- ISSN
- 0378-4290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2232236498
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 21.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Models of grain quality in wheat—A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.12.011
- The paper
- Nuttall, J. G., O'Leary, G. J., Panozzo, J. F., Walker, C. K., Barlow, K. M., & Fitzgerald, G. J. (2017). Models of grain quality in wheat—A review. Field Crops Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.12.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.