Cited by 397Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural safety and regulationsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops

Open access
Cellini, F, Chesson, A, Colquhoun, I, Constable, A, Davies, H.V, Engel, K.H, Gatehouse, A.M.R, Kärenlampi, S +6 more·2004·Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

The commercialisation of GM crops in Europe is practically non-existent at the present time. The European Commission has instigated changes to the regulatory process to address the concerns of consumers and member states and to pave the way for removing the current moratorium. With regard to the safety of GM crops and products, the current risk assessment process pays particular attention to potential adverse effects on human and animal health and the environment. This document deals with the concept of unintended effects in GM crops and products, i.e. effects that go beyond that of the original modification and that might impact primarily on health. The document first deals with the potential for unintended effects caused by the processes of transgene insertion (DNA rearrangements) and makes comparisons with genetic recombination events and DNA rearrangements in traditional breeding. The document then focuses on the potential value of evolving "profiling" or "omics" technologies as non-targeted, unbiased approaches, to detect unintended effects. These technologies include metabolomics (parallel analysis of a range of primary and secondary metabolites), proteomics (analysis of polypeptide complement) and transcriptomics (parallel analysis of gene expression). The technologies are described, together with their current limitations. Importantly, the significance of unintended effects on consumer health are discussed and conclusions and recommendations presented on the various approaches outlined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 183 · Cited by 397

Authors
Cellini, F., Chesson, A., Colquhoun, I., Constable, A., Davies, H. V., Engel, K. H., Gatehouse, A. M. R., Kärenlampi, S., Kok, E. J., Leguay, J.-J., Lehesranta, S., Noteborn, H. P. J. M., Pedersen, J., & Smith, M.
Affiliations
  • Norwich Research Park (GB)
  • Nestlé (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DK)
  • Unilever Research and Development Vlaardingen (NL)
Corresponding author
Engel, K.H
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-07
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
1089-1125
ISSN
0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153388322
Cited by
397
References
183
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 33
FWCI
27.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
genetically modified crops, unintended consequences, transgene integration, DNA rearrangement, genetic recombination, conventional breeding, metabolomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, omics technologies, consumer health, risk assessment, GM crop regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Consumer Product Safety, European Union, Food Analysis, Food Supply, Genetic Engineering, Humans, International Cooperation, Risk Assessment, Plants, Genetically Modified, Food, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review