Cited by 335Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentNutritional Studies and DietNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects

Ingested nitrate and nitrite and stomach cancer risk: An updated review

Bryan, Nathan S., Alexander, Dominik D., Coughlin, James R., Milkowski, Andrew L., Boffetta, Paolo·2012·Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

Nitrite and nitrate are naturally occurring molecules in vegetables and also added to cured and processed meats to delay spoilage and pathogenic bacteria growth. Research over the past 15 years has led to a paradigm change in our ideas about health effects of both nitrite and nitrate. Whereas, historically nitrite and nitrate were considered harmful food additives and listed as probable human carcinogens under conditions where endogenous nitrosation could take place, they are now considered by some as indispensible nutrients essential for cardiovascular health by promoting nitric oxide (NO) production. We provide an update to the literature and knowledge base concerning their safety. Most nitrite and nitrate exposure comes from naturally occurring and endogenous sources and part of the cell signaling effects of NO involve nitrosation. Nitrosation must now be considered broadly in terms of both S- and N-nitrosated species, since S-nitrosation is kinetically favored. Protein S-nitrosation is a significant part of the role of NO in cellular signal transduction and is involved in critical aspects of cardiovascular health. A critical review of the animal toxicology literature of nitrite indicates that in the absence of co-administration of a carcinogenic nitrosamine precursor, there is no evidence for carcinogenesis. Newly published prospective epidemiological cohort studies indicate that there is no association between estimated intake of nitrite and nitrate in the diet and stomach cancer. This new and growing body of evidence calls for a reconsideration of nitrite and nitrate safety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fct.2012.07.062

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to average nitrate/nitrite intake of adults in the US, most daily nitrate intake comes from vegetables, nitrite intake is primarily derived from recycled nitrate in saliva, and very little comes from cured meats and other dietary sources, suggesting that the entero-salivary route may be a more important source of nitrosamine exposure than exogenous intake including cured meats.

    “This is because, according to the average nitrate/nitrite intake of adults in the US, most of the daily nitrate intake (around 90%) comes from vegetables, and the nitrite intake is primarily derived from recycled nitrate in the saliva (5.2–8.6 mg/day nitrite), with very little coming from cured meats (0.05–0.6 mg/day nitrite in 50g/day cured meats) and other dietary sources (0–0.7 mg/day nitrite)”

    From NO-Rich Diet for Lifestyle-Related Diseases (2015) · cites this paper as [136]

  • The methodological aspects of studies linking red and cured meat intake to cancer have been challenged concerning the high dose of nitrosatable amines and the physiological difference between animals and humans.

    “However, the methodological aspects have been challenged concerning the high dose of nitrosatable amines, and the physiological difference between animals and humans [136].”

    From NO-Rich Diet for Lifestyle-Related Diseases (2015) · cites this paper as [136]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 197 · Cited by 335

Authors
Bryan, N. S., Alexander, D. D., Coughlin, J. R., Milkowski, A. L., & Boffetta, P.
Affiliations
  • Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine for the Prevention of Human Diseases (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • International Prevention Research Institute (FR)
Corresponding author
Bryan, Nathan S.
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
3646-3665
ISSN
0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965261164
Cited by
335
References
197
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 10
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Keywords
nitrate, nitrite, gastric cancer, nitrosation, S-nitrosylation, N-nitrosation, nitric oxide, processed meat, cured meat, dietary exposure, carcinogenesis, nitrosamine precursors, cardiovascular health, food additive safety
MeSH terms
Animals, Food Analysis, Humans, Nitrates, Nitrites, Risk Factors, Stomach Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review