Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phytochemical contents and enzyme inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Anethum graveolens L. (dill) samples cultivated under organic and conventional agricultural conditions

Erdogan Orhan, Ilkay, Senol, F. Sezer, Ozturk, Nilgun, Celik, Sadiye Ayse, Pulur, Aysen, Kan, Yuksel·2013·Food and Chemical Toxicology
DOI 10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.053
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Inhibitory effect of the n-hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and ethanol extracts from Anethum graveolens L. (dill) cultivated under organic (AG-O) and conventional (AG-C) conditions was tested against acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), and tyrosinase at 200 μg mL⁻¹. Their antioxidant activity was determined using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), N,N-dimethyl-p-phenylendiamine (DMPD), and nitric oxide (NO) radical scavenging assays as well as ferric ion-chelation capacity, ferric-(FRAP), and phosphomolybdenum-reducing antioxidant power (PRAP). The phytochemical analyses have been performed on both of the plant samples. GC-MS analysis pointed out that α-phellandrene was the main component in both of the essential oils in varying amounts (47.75% for AG-O and 27.94% for AG-C), while oleic acid was the dominant in the fruit oils of two samples (36.39% for AG-O and 53.87% for AG-C). HPLC analysis showed that both of the extracts contained rosmarinic acid as the major phenolic acid. The extracts inhibited BChE at moderate level, while the ethanol extracts exerted remarkable NO scavenging effect. The results emphasize that cultivation conditions may have effect on bioactivity and phytochemical content on plant samples.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.053

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Amin, 2007, Chemical and biological study of aerial parts of dill (Anethum graveolens L), Egyptian J. Biomed. Sci., 23, 1
  2. Badar, 2008, Characteristics of Anethum graveolens (Umbelliferae) seed oil: extraction, composition and antimicrobial activity, Int. J. Agric. Biol., 10, 329
  3. Blois, 1958, Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical, Nature, 181, 1199, 10.1038/1811199a0 · DOI
  4. Bonesi, 2010, Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of Pinus species essential oils and their constituents, J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem., 25, 622, 10.3109/14756360903389856 · DOI
  5. Chua, 2008, Antioxidant activities of ethanolic extracts from the twigs of Cinnamomum osmophleum, Bioresour. Technol., 99, 1918, 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.020 · DOI
  6. Dastmalchi, 2009, Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory-guided fractionation of Melissa officinalis L, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 17, 867, 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.11.034 · DOI
  7. Ellman, 1961, A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity, Biochem. Pharmacol., 7, 88, 10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9 · DOI
  8. Falcioni, 2002, Antioxidant activity of wheat sprouts extract in vitro: inhibition of DNA oxidative damage, J. Food Sci., 67, 2918, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb08838.x · DOI
  9. Heamalatha, 2011, Pharmacognostical, pharmacological, investigation on Anethum graveolens Linn: a review, Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci., 2, 564
  10. Jinesh, 2010, Comparative evaluation of antioxidant properties of edible and non-edible leaves of Anethum graveolens Linn, Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour., 1, 168
  11. Khalid, 2005, Chemical constituents of seed oils/meals of Pakistani Umbelliferae species as potential industrial raw material, J. Chem. Soc. Pak., 27, 358
  12. Khan, 2009, Cholinesterase inhibitory activities of some flavonoid derivatives chosen xanthone and their molecular docking studies, Chem.-Biol. Interact., 181, 2009
  13. Koenig, W.A., Joulain, D., Hochmuth, D.H., 2004. Terpenoids and Related Constituents of Essential Oils. MassFinder 3. In: Hochmuth DH (Ed.), Convenient and Rapid Analysis of GC–MS, Hamburg, Germany.
  14. Kurkcuoglu, 2003, Composition of volatiles obtained from spices by microdistillation, Chem. Nat. Compd., 39, 355, 10.1023/B:CONC.0000003415.49701.8b · DOI
  15. Marcocci, 1994, The nitric oxide scavenging properties of Ginkgo biloba extract, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 201, 748, 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1764 · DOI
  16. Masuda, 2005, Screening for tyrosinase inhibitors among extracts of seashore plants and identification of potent inhibitors from Garcinia subelliptica, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 69, 197, 10.1271/bbb.69.197 · DOI
  17. Nanasombad, 2009, Antimicrobial, antioxidant and anticancer activities of Thai local vegetables, J. Med. Plants Res., 3, 443
  18. Orhan, 2006, Recent developments in natural and synthetic drug research for Alzheimer’s disease, Lett. Drug Des. Discovery, 3, 268, 10.2174/157018006776743215 · DOI
  19. Orhan, 2008, Activity of essential oils and individual components against acetyl- and butyrylcholinesterase, Z. Naturforsch. Sect. C, 63, 547, 10.1515/znc-2008-7-813 · DOI
  20. Orhan, 2009, Cholinesterase inhibitory effects of the extracts and compounds of Maclura pomifera (Rafin.) Schneider, Food Chem. Toxicol., 47, 1747, 10.1016/j.fct.2009.04.023 · DOI
  21. Ortan, 2009, Contributions to the pharmacognostical study on Anethum graveolens, dill (Apiaceae), Romanian Biotechnol. Lett., 14, 4342
  22. Oyaizu, 1986, Studies on products of browning reactions–antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine, Jpn. J. Nutr., 44, 307, 10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.44.307 · DOI
  23. Ozturk, 2007, Determination of phenolic acids by a modified HPLC: its application to various plant materials, J. Liq. Chrom. Relat. Technol., 30, 587, 10.1080/10826070601093911 · DOI
  24. Pohanka, 2012, Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: a patent review (2008-present), Expert Opin. Ther. Patents, 22, 871, 10.1517/13543776.2012.701620 · DOI
  25. Radulescu, 2010, Chemical composition of the volatile oil from different plant parts of Anethum graveolens L. (Umbelliferae) cultivated in Romania, Farmacia, 58, 594
  26. Savelev, 2004, Butyryl- and acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitory activities in essential oils of Salvia species and their constituents, Phytother. Res., 18, 315, 10.1002/ptr.1451 · DOI
  27. Schlesier, 2002, Assessment of antioxidant activity by using different in vitro methods, Free Radical Res., 36, 177, 10.1080/10715760290006411 · DOI
  28. Sezgin, 2010, Antioxidant and mineral characteristics of some common vegetables consumed in Eastern Turkey, J. Food Agric. Environ., 8, 270
  29. Stannard, 1982, The multiple uses of dill (Anethum graveolens L.) in medieval medicine, Würzburg Med. Forsch., 24, 411
  30. Szwajgier, 2012, Screening for cholinesterase inhibitors in selected fruits and vegetables, Electr. J. Polish Agric. Univ., 15, 1
  31. Thukham-mee, 2012, Evaluation of safety and protective effect of combined extract of Cissampelos pareira and Anethum graveolens (PM52) against age-related cognitive impairment, Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med., 2012, 10.1155/2012/674101 · DOI
  32. Ugulu, 2009, The investigation and quantitative ethnobotanical evaluation of medicinal plants used around Izmir province, Turkey, J. Med. Plants Res., 3, 345

Cited by

See all 60

Metadata

Authors
Erdogan Orhan, I., Senol, F. S., Ozturk, N., Celik, S. A., Pulur, A., & Kan, Y.
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
59
Pages
96-103
ISSN
0278-6915
DOI
10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.053
Cited by
60
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytochemical contents and enzyme inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Anethum graveolens L. (dill) samples cultivated under organic and conventional agricultural conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.053
The paper
Erdogan Orhan, I., Senol, F. S., Ozturk, N., Celik, S. A., Pulur, A., & Kan, Y. (2013). Phytochemical contents and enzyme inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Anethum graveolens L. (dill) samples cultivated under organic and conventional agricultural conditions. Food and Chemical Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.053