Cited by 83Free Radicals and AntioxidantsPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesMetal complexes synthesis and properties

Protective role of quercetin against copper(II)-induced oxidative stress: A spectroscopic, theoretical and DNA damage study

Jomova, Klaudia, Lawson, Michael, Drostinova, Lenka, Lauro, Peter, Poprac, Patrik, Brezova, Vlasta, Michalik, Martin, Lukes, Vladimir +1 more·2017·Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

The radical scavenging and metal chelating properties of flavonoids indicate that they may play a protective role in diseases with perturbed metal homeostasis such as Alzheimer's disease. In this work we investigated the effect of the coordination of quercetin to copper(II) in view of the formation of ROS in Cu-catalyzed Fenton reaction. ABTS and DPPH assays confirmed that the copper(II)-quercetin complex exhibits a stronger radical scavenging activity than does quercetin alone. EPR spin trapping experiments have shown that chelation of quercetin to copper significantly suppressed the formation of hydroxyl radicals in the Cu(II)-Fenton reaction. DNA damage experiments revealed a protective effect for quercetin, but only at higher stoichiometric ratios of quercetin relative to copper. DNA protective effect of quercetin against ROS attack was described by two mechanisms. The first mechanism lies in suppressed formation of ROS due to the decreased catalytic action of copper in the Fenton reaction, as a consequence of its chelation and direct scavenging of ROS by free quercetin. Since the Cu-quercetin complex intercalates into DNA, the second mechanism was attributed to a suppressed intercalating ability of the Cu-quercetin complex due to the mildly intercalating free quercetin into DNA, thus creating a protective wall against stronger intercalators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fct.2017.10.042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 83

Authors
Jomova, K., Lawson, M., Drostinova, L., Lauro, P., Poprac, P., Brezova, V., Michalik, M., Lukes, V., & Valko, M.
Affiliations
  • Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra (SK)
  • Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava (SK)
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
110
Pages
340-350
ISSN
0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765546586
Cited by
83
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Scientific Grant Agency (VEGA (1/0686/17, 1/0041/15, 1/0594/16)
  • Research and Development Support Agency (APVV-15-079)
  • Grant Agency of Constantine Philosopher University in Nitra (VII/6/2014)
  • European Commission (26220220180)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Free Radicals and Antioxidants
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Metal complexes synthesis and properties
Keywords
quercetin, copper(II) complexes, oxidative stress, Fenton reaction, hydroxyl radicals, free radical scavenging, metal chelation, DNA damage, DNA intercalation, flavonoids, Alzheimer's disease, metal homeostasis, antioxidant activity
MeSH terms
Copper, DNA Damage, DNA, Bacterial, Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy, Escherichia coli, Quercetin, Oxidative Stress, Protective Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review