The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impacts of heavy metal contamination and phytoremediation on a microbial community during a twelve-month microcosm experiment
Open accessAbstract
The effects of heavy metals and phytoextraction practices on a soil microbial community were studied during 12 months using a hyperaccumulating plant (Thlaspi caerulescens) grown in an artificially contaminated soil. The 16S ribosomal RNA genes of the Bacteria and the beta-Proteobacteria and the amoA gene (encoding the alpha-subunit of ammonia monooxygenase) were PCR-amplified and analysed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Principal component analysis (PCA) of the DGGE data revealed that: (i) the heavy metals had the most drastic effects on the bacterial groups targeted, (ii) the plant induced changes which could be observed in the amoA and in the Bacteria 16S rRNA gene patterns, (iii) the changes observed during 12 months in the DGGE-patterns of the planted contaminated soil did not indicate recovery of the initial bacterial community present in the non-contaminated soil. The potential function of the microbial community was assessed recording community level physiological profiles (CLPP) and analysing them by PCA. The lower capability of the bacterial community to degrade the substrates provided in the BIOLOG plates, in particular the amino acids, amides and amines, as well as a delay in the average well colour development (AWCD) differentiated the bacterial community of the contaminated samples from that of the non-contaminated ones. However, the plant had a positive effect on substrate utilization as shown by the greater number of substrates used in all planted samples compared to unplanted ones. Finally, the measurement of the potential ammonia oxidation indicated that ammonia oxidising bacteria were completely inhibited in the contaminated soil. The stimulation of ammonia oxidation by the plant observed in the non-contaminated samples was surpassed by the inhibitory effect of the heavy metals in the contaminated soil. This study emphasises the combined use of culture-independent techniques with conventional methods to investigate the ecology of bacteria in their natural habitats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: An evaluation
Mulligan, C. N., Yong, R. N., & Gibbs, B. F. (2001) · Engineering Geology · doi:10.1016/s0013-7952(00)00101-0 · Cited by 1,521
Cited by
Garau, G., Castaldi, P., Santona, L., Deiana, P., & Melis, P. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.011 · Cited by 364
Measuring the effects of pesticides on bacterial communities in soil: A critical review
Imfeld, G., & Vuilleumier, S. (2012) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.11.010 · Cited by 323
Barillot, C. D. C., Sarde, C.-O., Bert, V., Tarnaud, E., & Cochet, N. (2013) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-012-0491-y · Cited by 262
Trace element phytoextraction from contaminated soil: a case study under Mediterranean climate
Guidi Nissim, W., Palm, E., Mancuso, S., & Azzarello, E. (2018) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1197-x · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Gremion, F., Chatzinotas, A., Kaufmann, K., Sigler, W., & Harms, H.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-283
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6941
- OpenAlex
- W2119275725
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impacts of heavy metal contamination and phytoremediation on a microbial community during a twelve-month microcosm experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.02.004
- The paper
- Gremion, F., Chatzinotas, A., Kaufmann, K., Sigler, W., & Harms, H. (2004). Impacts of heavy metal contamination and phytoremediation on a microbial community during a twelve-month microcosm experiment. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.02.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.