Cited by 83Sperm and Testicular FunctionMale Reproductive Health StudiesCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

Relationship between human semen parameters and deoxyribonucleic acid damage assessed by the neutral comet assay

Open access
Trisini, Ana T., Singh, Narendra P., Duty, Susan M., Hauser, Russ·2004·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To explore the association between semen parameters and sperm DNA damage. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Andrology clinic. Patient(s) Two hundred fifty-seven men undergoing infertility assessment. Intervention(s) None. Main outcome measure(s) Sperm concentration and motility were measured using computer-assisted sperm analysis; morphology was scored using the strict criteria. The neutral comet assay was used to measure sperm DNA damage. Comet assay parameters included comet extent, percent DNA in the comet tail, and tail distributed moment, an integrated measure of length and intensity. We also scored cells that were too long to measure (>300 microm), which we referred to as cells with high DNA damage. Result(s) Men older than 35 years had a statistically significant increase in the number of cells with high DNA damage as compared with younger men. In age-adjusted regression analyses, the most consistent associations were found between semen parameters and the number of cells with high DNA damage. For an interquartile range change in the number of cells with high DNA damage, sperm concentration declined 14.2 x 10(6)/mL, motility declined 4.3%, and morphology declined 0.5%. Comet extent and percent DNA in the comet tail were also associated with a decline in sperm concentration and motility, respectively. Conclusion(s) Although there were associations between semen and comet assay parameters, their magnitudes were weak, suggesting that the comet assay provides addit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.087

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trisini, A. T., Singh, N. P., Duty, S. M., & Hauser, R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Hauser, Russ
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
82
Issue
6
Pages
1623-1632
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978168168
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES 09718, R01ES009718, P30ES000002, ES 00002)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
sperm DNA damage, semen parameters, sperm concentration, sperm motility, sperm morphology, male infertility, neutral comet assay, sperm function, male age
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, DNA Damage, Humans, Male, Regression Analysis, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Comet Assay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review