Relationship between human semen parameters and deoxyribonucleic acid damage assessed by the neutral comet assay
Open accessAbstract
Objective To explore the association between semen parameters and sperm DNA damage. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Andrology clinic. Patient(s) Two hundred fifty-seven men undergoing infertility assessment. Intervention(s) None. Main outcome measure(s) Sperm concentration and motility were measured using computer-assisted sperm analysis; morphology was scored using the strict criteria. The neutral comet assay was used to measure sperm DNA damage. Comet assay parameters included comet extent, percent DNA in the comet tail, and tail distributed moment, an integrated measure of length and intensity. We also scored cells that were too long to measure (>300 microm), which we referred to as cells with high DNA damage. Result(s) Men older than 35 years had a statistically significant increase in the number of cells with high DNA damage as compared with younger men. In age-adjusted regression analyses, the most consistent associations were found between semen parameters and the number of cells with high DNA damage. For an interquartile range change in the number of cells with high DNA damage, sperm concentration declined 14.2 x 10(6)/mL, motility declined 4.3%, and morphology declined 0.5%. Comet extent and percent DNA in the comet tail were also associated with a decline in sperm concentration and motility, respectively. Conclusion(s) Although there were associations between semen and comet assay parameters, their magnitudes were weak, suggesting that the comet assay provides addit…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other studies reported no correlation, or a very weak correlation, between abnormal sperm morphology and SDF.
“However, other studies reported no correlation, or a very weak correlation, between abnormal sperm morphology and SDF (78-80).”
From Isolated teratozoospermia: revisiting its relevance in male infertility: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [79]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Isolated teratozoospermia: revisiting its relevance in male infertility: a narrative review
Atmoko, W., Savira, M., Shah, R., Chung, E., & Agarwal, A. (2024) · Translational Andrology and Urology · doi:10.21037/tau-23-397 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Trisini, A. T., Singh, N. P., Duty, S. M., & Hauser, R.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hauser, Russ
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1623-1632
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978168168
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES 09718, R01ES009718, P30ES000002, ES 00002)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Keywords
- sperm DNA damage, semen parameters, sperm concentration, sperm motility, sperm morphology, male infertility, neutral comet assay, sperm function, male age
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, DNA Damage, Humans, Male, Regression Analysis, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Comet Assay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review