Cited by 158Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsMenstrual Health and Disorders

Endometriosis in premenarcheal girls who do not have an associated obstructive anomaly

Open access
Marsh, Erica E., Laufer, Marc R.·2005·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To identify endometriosis as a cause of chronic pelvic pain in premenarcheal girls without an obstructive anomaly of the reproductive tract.Design A case series.Setting Tertiary-care academic pediatric hospital.Patient(s) Five premenarcheal girls with chronic (>6 months) pelvic pain and negative gastrointestinal workup.Intervention(s) Laparoscopic biopsies and resection, laser and/or cautery of all visible lesions.Main outcome measure(s) Visual presence of endometriosis and decrease in pelvic pain after destruction of lesions.Result(s) All subjects had laparoscopy with the identification of clear, red, and/or white lesions consistent with endometriosis based on the standard American Society for Reproductive Medicine Classification of Endometriosis. Postoperatively, all of the girls had marked improvement of their pelvic pain based on self-reported pain scales. Two of the subjects had subsequent repeat laparoscopies 6 and 8 years after their initial surgery, which revealed pathology-proven endometriosis.Conclusion(s) Endometriosis should be part of the differential diagnosis of chronic pelvic/lower abdominal pain in premenarcheal girls. The presence of lesions visibly consistent with endometriosis in premenarcheal girls without an obstructive anomaly supports the concept that some cases of endometriosis may result from an etiology other than retrograde menses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.08.025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rare premenarcheal endometriosis that presents the same phenotype with angiogenic peritoneal implants and the formation of OMA as adolescent endometriosis is unexplained by Sampson's hypothesis.

    “There are three major observations that support the hypothesis of neonatal menstruation and the risk of early including the rare premenarcheal endometriosis that presents the same phenotype with angiogenic peritoneal implants and the formation of OMA as adolescent endometriosis, is unexplained by Sampson's hypothesis (33,34).”

    From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [34]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 158

Authors
Marsh, E. E., & Laufer, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Laufer, Marc R.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
758-760
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973939452
Cited by
158
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
endometriosis, premenarcheal girls, chronic pelvic pain, differential diagnosis, laparoscopic resection, endometriosis classification, retrograde menstruation, endometriosis recurrence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Biopsy, Child, Chronic Disease, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Menarche, Pelvic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review