Cited by 38Sperm and Testicular FunctionPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsReproductive Health and Technologies

Chromosomal analysis of spermatozoa with normal-sized heads in two infertile patients with macrocephalic sperm head syndrome

Open access
Guthauser, Bruno, Vialard, François, Dakouane, Mbarka, Izard, Vincent, Albert, Martine, Selva, Jacqueline·2006·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To study the chromosomal content of spermatozoa that could be selected for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in cases of macrocephalic sperm head syndrome. Design Case report. Setting Obstetrics, gynecology, urology, and reproductive biology departments. Patient(s) Two infertile patient candidates for ICSI presenting with total teratozoospermia (100%) with mainly large-headed spermatozoa (91% and 82%, respectively). Intervention(s) Fluorescence in situ hybridization with X, Y, 18 centromeric probes on unselected spermatozoa (all migrated spermatozoa) and specifically on selected spermatozoa with normal-sized heads. Main outcome measure(s) Percentage of polyploid, diploid, aneuploid, and normal haploid spermatozoa, according to X, Y, 18 chromosome centromeric probes on selected spermatozoa (head size compatible with ICSI). Result(s) All the nonselected spermatozoa were abnormal, diploid, or polyploid. The rate of normal ploidy (haploid cells) among the selected sperm population was 1 per 28 for patient 1 and 5 per 51 for patient 2. Conclusion(s) This very low proportion of normal haploid spermatozoa among selected spermatozoa contraindicated ICSI for the two patients. We suggest performance of this selection and analysis before including (or not), in an ICSI program, patients with macrocephalic sperm head syndrome, associated or not with preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1334

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guthauser, B., Vialard, F., Dakouane, M., Izard, V., Albert, M., & Selva, J.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Bicêtre Hospital (FR)
  • Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR)
Corresponding author
Guthauser, Bruno
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
750.e5-750.e7
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033560044
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
sperm head size, male infertility, teratozoospermia, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, sperm selection, sperm chromosomal abnormalities, sperm aneuploidy, preimplantation genetic diagnosis
MeSH terms
Contraindications, Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18, Diploidy, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Oligospermia, Ploidies, Polyploidy, Sperm Head, Spermatozoa, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic, Chromosomes, Human, X, Chromosomes, Human, Y

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review