Socioeconomic and racial disparities among infertility patients seeking care
Open accessAbstract
Objective To examine sociodemographic differences based on patient race/ethnicity among infertility patients seeking care in a state with mandated coverage of infertility treatment.Design Cross-sectional survey.Setting University-hospital-based fertility center.Patient(s) A total of 1,500 consecutive women who presented for infertility care.Intervention(s) None.Main outcome measure(s) Self-report questionnaire assessing patient race/ethnicity, diagnosis, income, education level, and duration of infertility before seeking care.Result(s) African American women experienced a significantly longer duration of infertility before seeking care compared with Caucasian women (4.3 vs. 3.3 years, respectively; P=.03). With regard to infertility diagnosis, a significantly greater proportion of African American and Hispanic women had tubal factor infertility compared with Caucasian women (24.0% and 27.3% vs. 5.3%, respectively; P=.001). Looking at the highest level of education attained by patients, a significantly greater proportion of African American and Hispanic women had less than a 4-year college degree compared with Caucasian women (48% and 40.9% vs. 13.2%, respectively; P<.001). Examining the gross annual household income of patients, a significantly greater proportion of African American and Hispanic women had household incomes below $100,000 compared with Caucasian women (72% and 68.2% vs. 37.3%, respectively; P<.01).Conclusion(s) African American women are more likely to seek infertility treatment after a longer duration of failed conception compared with Caucasian women. Furthermore, African American, and Hispanic women are more likely to have tubal factor infertility, a lower education level, and a lower household income compared with Caucasian women.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women who seek a medical evaluation for infertility differ from women who do not on important demographic, lifestyle, and access factors.
“Since women who seek a medical evaluation for infertility differ from those women who do not on important demographic, lifestyle, and access factors (Farland, under review for publication) (10–18) additional analyses of infertility type were conducted using male factor infertility as the reference group.”
From Infertility, fertility treatment, and risk of hypertension (2015) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 304
- Authors
- Jain, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jain, Tarun
- ORCID
- Jain, Tarun
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 876-881
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011717467
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 11.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- infertility, racial disparities, socioeconomic disparities, African American women, Hispanic women, infertility duration, tubal infertility, household income, educational attainment, infertility treatment access
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Asian, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Infertility, Female, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Chi-Square Distribution, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review