Low-dose oral contraceptive pill for dysmenorrhea associated with endometriosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial
Open accessAbstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a low-dose oral contraceptive pill (OCP) for patients with dysmenorrhea associated with endometriosis.Design A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Settings Clinical trial sites in Japan.Patient(s) One hundred patients with dysmenorrhea associated with endometriosis. Most enrolled patients had radiologic evidence of endometriosis rather than surgical diagnosis.Intervention(s) Patients were randomly assigned to receive either monophasic OCP (ethinylestradiol plus norethisterone) or placebo. Participants used their usual pain medications as needed during the trial.Main outcome measure(s) After four cyclic treatments, we used a zero- to three-point verbal rating scale and a visual analogue scale to measure the severity of disability because of dysmenorrhea in daily life, and the patients' use of analgesics.Result(s) Total dysmenorrhea scores assessed by the verbal rating scale were significantly decreased at the end of treatment in both groups. From the first cycle through the end of treatment, dysmenorrhea in the OCP group was significantly milder than in the placebo group. Nonmenstrual pelvic pain was present at baseline in 24.5% (12 of 49) of the OCP group and 34.0% (16 of 47) of the placebo group. The volume of endometrioma (larger than 3 cm in diameter) was significantly decreased in the OCP group, but not in the placebo group. No serious adverse events related to using OCPs occurred.Conclusion(s) The present study clearly demonstrated for the first time that OCPs could be used to effectively and safely treat pain associated with endometriosis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In two trials conducted in Japan comparing COCs with placebo in women with endometriosis, COC treatment was associated with improvement in dysmenorrhea, cyclical non-menstrual pain, dyspareunia, and dyschezia.
“Only two trials [244, 245], both conducted in Japan, compared COCs with placebo in women with endometriosis. In these studies, COCs treatment was associated with an improvement in dysmenorrhea, cyclical non-menstrual pain, dyspareunia and dyschezia.”
From Hormonal treatments for endometriosis: The endocrine background (2022) · cites this paper as [244]
The Study Design identifies one placebo-controlled trial conducted in Japan, and Changes in Pain Score reports greater improvement in dysmenorrhea with the OCP. Nonmenstrual pelvic pain improved on the visual analogue scale only in the OCP group, but not significantly on the verbal rating scale. This paper does not establish that there were only two Japanese trials or report improvement in dyspareunia or dyschezia in its trial; the cited passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOnly one randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of OCPs in endometriosis has ever been published.
“Surprisingly, only one randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of OCPs in endometriosis has ever been published [63].”
From Endometriosis and Medical Therapy: From Progestogens to Progesterone Resistance to GnRH Antagonists: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
OCPs given for four months produce a statistically significant, though modest, improvement in dysmenorrhea compared to placebo, with about a 50% reduction in dysmenorrhea.
“A statistically significant, though modest, improvement in dysmenorrhea was found with OCPs given for four months compared to placebo. OCP administration resulted in about a 50% reduction in dysmenorrhea.”
From Endometriosis and Medical Therapy: From Progestogens to Progesterone Resistance to GnRH Antagonists: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
The risk of venous or arterial thrombosis with OCPs is not negligible.
“the risk of venous or arterial thrombosis is not negligible [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67].”
From Endometriosis and Medical Therapy: From Progestogens to Progesterone Resistance to GnRH Antagonists: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 289
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [5]5. Cecil Text Book of Medicine. 22nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2004:1500.
- [10]10. Davis AR, Westhoff C, O'Connell K, Gallagher N. Oral contraceptive for dysmenorrhea in adolescent girls. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106: 97-104.
- Authors
- Harada, T., Momoeda, M., Taketani, Y., Hoshiai, H., & Terakawa, N.
- Affiliations
- Tottori University (JP)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Kindai University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Harada, Tasuku
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1583-1588
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147856649
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 15.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, ethinyl estradiol, norethisterone, analgesic use, treatment efficacy and safety
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analgesics, Contraceptives, Oral, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic, Double-Blind Method, Dysmenorrhea, Endometriosis, Ethinyl Estradiol, Female, Humans, Japan, Norethindrone, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review