Geographic distribution of reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellowships in the United States
Open accessAbstract
Objective To examine in detail the geographic distribution of reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellowships in the United States.Design Ecological.Setting University-based REI fellowship program.Patient(s) None.Intervention(s) None.Main outcome measure(s) Number and location of REI fellowship positions.Result(s) A significant association was found between the number of REI fellowship positions and the number of categorical postgraduate year-1 (PGY-1) obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residency positions within states. No association was observed among the land area, population, or population density within states. However, despite the fact that in the East, as in the United States overall, there was no association between population density and number of fellowships, West of the Mississippi River, as the population density increased, the number of REI fellowships increased linearly (test for heterogeneity = 0.007).Conclusion(s) First-year REI fellowship positions in the United States are correlated with the number of categorical PGY-1 OBGYN residency positions within a state. The geographically uneven distribution of fellowship positions may limit the choices for OBGYN residents wishing to pursue further training in REI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women who seek a medical evaluation for infertility differ from women who do not on important demographic, lifestyle, and access factors.
“Since women who seek a medical evaluation for infertility differ from those women who do not on important demographic, lifestyle, and access factors (Farland, under review for publication) (10–18) additional analyses of infertility type were conducted using male factor infertility as the reference group.”
From Infertility, fertility treatment, and risk of hypertension (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 2 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Abusief, M. E., Missmer, S. A., Barbieri, R. L., Jain, T., & Hornstein, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hornstein, Mark D.
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1636-1641
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003012009
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- geographic distribution, population density, health workforce distribution, United States
- MeSH terms
- Endocrinology, Fellowships and Scholarships, Gynecology, Humans, Infertility, Internship and Residency, Obstetrics, Reproduction, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review