Cited by 11Diversity and Career in MedicineHealth and Medical Research ImpactsInnovations in Medical Education

Geographic distribution of reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellowships in the United States

Open access
Abusief, Mary E., Missmer, Stacey A., Barbieri, Robert L., Jain, Tarun, Hornstein, Mark D.·2009·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To examine in detail the geographic distribution of reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellowships in the United States.Design Ecological.Setting University-based REI fellowship program.Patient(s) None.Intervention(s) None.Main outcome measure(s) Number and location of REI fellowship positions.Result(s) A significant association was found between the number of REI fellowship positions and the number of categorical postgraduate year-1 (PGY-1) obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residency positions within states. No association was observed among the land area, population, or population density within states. However, despite the fact that in the East, as in the United States overall, there was no association between population density and number of fellowships, West of the Mississippi River, as the population density increased, the number of REI fellowships increased linearly (test for heterogeneity = 0.007).Conclusion(s) First-year REI fellowship positions in the United States are correlated with the number of categorical PGY-1 OBGYN residency positions within a state. The geographically uneven distribution of fellowship positions may limit the choices for OBGYN residents wishing to pursue further training in REI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.055

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women who seek a medical evaluation for infertility differ from women who do not on important demographic, lifestyle, and access factors.

    “Since women who seek a medical evaluation for infertility differ from those women who do not on important demographic, lifestyle, and access factors (Farland, under review for publication) (10–18) additional analyses of infertility type were conducted using male factor infertility as the reference group.”

    From Infertility, fertility treatment, and risk of hypertension (2015) · cites this paper as [17]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 2 · Cited by 11

Authors
Abusief, M. E., Missmer, S. A., Barbieri, R. L., Jain, T., & Hornstein, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Hornstein, Mark D.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
91
Issue
5
Pages
1636-1641
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003012009
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
geographic distribution, population density, health workforce distribution, United States
MeSH terms
Endocrinology, Fellowships and Scholarships, Gynecology, Humans, Infertility, Internship and Residency, Obstetrics, Reproduction, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review