Cited by 14Intestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsHemostasis and retained surgical itemsBlood transfusion and management

Evaluation of a fibrin preparation containing tranexamic acid (Adhexil) in a rabbit uterine horn model of adhesions with and without bleeding and in a model with two surgical loci

Open access
Wiseman, David M., Meidler, Roberto, Lyahovetsky, Yacov, Kurman, Eran, Horn, Sara, Nur, Israel·2010·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of a fibrin preparation supplemented with tranexamic acid (Adhexil) with that of established devices, and to determine whether its effect is limited to the site of application. Design Rabbit uterine horns were abraded in nonbleeding and bleeding variants of an established adhesions model. In a separate study, a sidewall excision with approximation of the abraded cecum was added. Animals randomly received Adhexil at both, neither, or either loci. Setting Laboratory study. Animal(s) Seventy-two female New Zealand White rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Intervention(s) Adhexil, Seprafilm or SprayGel and Interceed. Main outcome measure(s) The extent of adhesions was evaluated 13 to 16 days after surgery. Result(s) Adhexil reduced adhesions (15 +/- 7%; 15 +/- 4%) compared with controls (74 +/- 13%; 78 +/- 9%) in the bleeding and nonbleeding models, respectively. The reductions resulting from the use of Seprafilm (39 +/- 17%; 34 +/- 14%) or SprayGel (61 +/- 18%; 43 +/- 14%) (n = 4) were not statistically significant. In the bleeding model, Interceed (48 +/- 15%) reduced adhesions only modestly. Conclusion(s) In the combined uterine and sidewall model, Adhexil reduced selectively the extent and incidence of adhesions. The absolute and relative performance of Adhexil in an established adhesions model and in the presence of bleeding justifies its further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.026

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AdhexilTM, a fibrin sealant enhanced with tranexamic acid, exhibits superior efficacy in significantly reducing postoperative adhesions, as shown by preclinical and clinical studies.

    “Adhexil™ (Omrix Biopharmaceuticals, Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel), a fibrin sealant enhanced with tranexamic acid, is a notable achievement in uterine wound healing products, exhibiting superior efficacy in significantly reducing postoperative adhesions, as shown by compelling evidence from both preclinical and clinical studies [76].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiseman, D. M., Meidler, R., Lyahovetsky, Y., Kurman, E., Horn, S., & Nur, I.
Corresponding author
Wiseman, David M.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
93
Issue
4
Pages
1045-1051
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996018402
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemostasis and retained surgical items
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
Keywords
tranexamic acid, postoperative adhesions, adhesion prevention, surgical bleeding, Seprafilm, Interceed
MeSH terms
Tissue Adhesions, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Combinations, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Female, Fibrin, Hemorrhage, Hyaluronic Acid, Rabbits, Tranexamic Acid, Uterine Hemorrhage, Uterus, Postoperative Hemorrhage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review